Analysis: the owner of the control the minister was allowed to go, but it is still soothing bubbling parliament

the Final straw after weeks of wallowing in your Post-dispute was the company's morning announcement.

Postal insurance chairman of the board of its Markku Pohjola at the entrance, that the state-the owner objected to at any stage orally and in writing to a proposed movement donation.

Yet yesterday the prime minister Antti Rinne (sd.) certificate in parliamentary question time, that the Post office of the owner against the will of the. Despite the fact that will was clearly communicated.

the movement of the transfer has been controversial in the core, because in practice it threatened to cause about 700 package species preparation for the transition to the most advantageous collective agreements of the district. The slope is in the public domain on several occasions, that his government can be such to accept.

This is not the first contradiction of Mail around in the debate. When new contradictions are revealed repeatedly, not all can survive the driest feet.

minister responsible for ownership steering Sirpa Paatero (sd.) have today to go. At the same time he became sick.

Paateroa has been considered Slope as a supporter and as a close political partner.

during the Day the media front was seen as a serious prime minister. Paateroa has been considered Slope as a supporter and as a close political partner.

the Prime minister, according to Paatero had not cared enough to clearly state-the owner of the vision Post. At the same time, the Slope, however, noted that the difference was specific to paatero's proposal. He himself told me he heard it moments before the news conference.

the Slope also reiterated earlier claims about how the Mail has come to fade out essential information during the trip.

Open issues devoid of the answers is still up in the air.

If the state-owned company of the government to hide information from the government, and it's not a serious matter? Should it lead to the company's board to get rid of?

and who really determine the state-owner's point of view? The slope of the ice figure, which the government the owner of the policy should be fully consistent with the prime minister's personal line.

Mail the change of government would not have enough response to political pressure and questions of conflicting opinions.

Why Paatero then got to go?

you Can think of, that there was no alternative. Mail the change of government would not have enough response to political pressure and questions of conflicting opinions. Policy eventually politicians, often ministers, bear responsibility.

Slope reason at a briefing in indirectly Paatero staff, but esikuntakin works minister under the auspices of the.

the state of the owner control seems to cause headaches to the minister after another. The minister is not asked to set off from the companies for things one at a time. Must be self-awake, and initiative, their own competences.

As North as the morning message was: many operational matter directly to the company of their own competence. On the other hand, the state the company works primarily with officials. The economy in a recent interview with the owner of the control of the chief of defense mail of the government (you move to another service). Sometimes the minister had to go so against the grain of both.

but all the same: if something unwanted happens, the minister is responsible.

Partners so far have been quiet, but today the greens and the center have called the social democratic party from the "sedimentation".

Slope in terms of the problem is that he himself has been in a dispute sometimes even Paateroa more active. Yesterday he took a visible role in the parliamentary question time.

Even today, the Hillside was important to reiterate their position on Postal activities. Slope wants to show that his government prevent "collective shopping". It may be that Paatero difference to save the slope of the tough political prässiltä. The prime minister is now alone in the line of fire.

the Opposition time to cook is self-evident. The national coalition party, the christian democrats and now-business have left the intermediate question, which the government gets to answer on Tuesday. Also, the finns are demanding prime minister's resignation. It is the opposition's role.

the ministers cannot remain in their own parties and government partners voice. The partners have so far been quiet, but today the greens and the center have called the social democratic party from the "sedimentation".

crisis communication rule, that the answers and the apologies and the like to be incomplete. Must give a clear answer, and the answer can change. If something is not known, it is worth to admit out loud and promised to return soon with an answer.

Now is the slope of the floor gives a long formula, the answer to their government partners.

see also:

the Opposition upset the Post-soup a new twist: Halla-aho of the flash to the Slope difference, An orphan, according to the prime minister "does not deserve confidence"

the minister Sirpa Paatero resignation, the opposition demanded already in the slope of the difference – Very follow the moment to moment

the Prime minister of the Slope in question time: Post did not comply with the owner the control of the minister for the ban to employees in the transfer – "Paatero said that this visit"

Analysis: Mail the dispute was resolved, but the front is the aftermath – the Slope and Paatero stories stir the different stages do not fully match

Subscribe Yle newsletters!

Get Overeating the best content straight to your inbox!

Proceed to order