- John HasslerFölj
In times of crisis comes change, sometimes for the better. The 90's crisis was long and deep, but after that Sweden was better and more competitive. Is coronakrisen a time to do a complete renovation of our country.
We should be able to replace dirty industries with a long-term, sustainable businesses that pay good wages, to build an eco-friendly transport, without the airfare and spend more on domestic production, and less production. Many of the proposals in this regard are in the discussion, and ledarsidor. They sound appealing, but is based on a faulty analysis of the crisis and run the risk of doing it unnecessarily is deep and long.
Coronakrisen is in a completely different way. While the flaws in our emergency response is now becoming clear, however, the crisis was created by a virus, it is not to be built on the ground. The reason for this crisis is going to go away, even though we don't really know when to use them. The 90-talskrisens methods may be the wrong medicine to this day. Now if we were pushing for big changes, the crisis will be as deep as it was then.
There are a lot of people who lost their jobs in the hospitality industry should be able to build the checked as well
It is true that Sweden needs to change. We aim to be carbon neutral and to develop a long-term sustainable development. The transformation takes place best in an orderly manner and not by means of shock therapy. One such is liable to lead to conflict and resistance. Now is not the time to be with a purpose to make people redundant if they are involved in the activities of the politician considers that is not ”sustainable”. Therefore, the policy aim is to overcome the crisis. To the extent possible, after the crisis look like that before.
it will, of course, is not to look exactly like the one before it. Maybe we'll travel less, and to change other habits. But the way it's going to happen with this one, no one knows, especially not the politicians. This is something that we have to take care of once the crisis is over, even if it is not wrong to think about that right now.
the Government can now afford to help the people and businesses who lost income as a result of borrowing from the rest of us. However, this does not mean that it is the labor and the machines that can be used for real economic investment. These should be made after careful thought in which the costs are weighed against the benefits.
a Crisis is not the golden opportunity to have a complete makover.< https://embed.radioplay.io?id=68433&country_iso=se"
READ MORE: : Sweden is not the time to killgissa of the crisis. READ MORE: , Therefore, we would like to skimp for the economists to suddenly open up the wallet