Immigration accumulated so enormous costs that it impairs the welfare of its citizens. The naive immigration policy through several decades has led to that we get a poorer welfare provision than necessary. Work must always at length better than transfers.Integration – knowledge, sustainability and værekraft Debate
STATISTICS tell us that 56 percent of all social welfare goes to immigrants. In Oslo go the entire 71 per cent of all social assistance to the immigrants. SSB emphasizes the fact that the majority of the recipients come from Africa and Asia.
there is Little evidence of that the development is about to turn. Of all the refugees who came in the period 2008-2017, working only 12,6 per cent full-time. The middle class must in the long term, work more and pay higher taxes to finance this, at the same time as velferdstilbudene be degraded because it is constantly more that need to share the same cake.
For the Progress party, it is out of the question with increased taxes and reduced welfare in order to maintain non-western immigration. We want social welfare to go to Norwegian citizens and others who live and work here, and we will ensure these benefits for future generations.
the welfare state will continue, we have to take two overall steps: We need to reduce further the reception of non-western immigrants. We must make taxpayers of them living on transfers.- Norway must send us to places where we can get the job Dagbladet Plus
The only road out of poverty runs through the work. But this road is made extra long and hard when the incentives to work are not strong enough. When immigrants can get just as much or more in benefits than if they worked, is it not a mystery that the participation rate is so low.
We want to help people in need and it is best done by helping people where they are. Used properly in the vicinity, we can help up to 70 times more people than we can in Norway. It is more human and fair.
Those who still come here must be met with the requirement that they should contribute to society, learn the language and get a job. It is the only way to ensure sustainability.
Therefore, we have in the community put even more requirements. We must become a society where it is perceived to be far more attractive to work than not to work. Shall we do it, we need to realign the system so that the total assistance they receive from society can never be as good, or better, than a regular income. This is a principle we hope all parties can unite around.Shaking her head of Fp-numbers