You want to silence Hanif Bali – it threatens democracy

"You want to silence Hanif Bali – the threat to democracy"

"Reply from Ann Heberlein on Fredrik Malm's views on freedom of expression."

"This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against."

"REPLICA. It was long since I heard someone claim their willingness to die for the opponent's right to express their opinions. I refer, of course, on the quote wrongly attributed to Voltaire – ”I do not share your opinions, but is willing to die for your right to express them” – and who has previously been something of a liberal manifesto. "

"Now blow, however, other winds, and the Liberals have abandoned their earlier ideals. Today it is liberals, as Fredrik Malm, who cries out to a maximum after censorship. "

"freedom of speech is one of the rights governed by the united nations universal declaration of human rights. In article 19, we can read about everyone's right to freedom of opinion and expression and freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. "

"The last statement – ”without borders” – is not entirely correct, because freedom of expression is limited by the legal limits applicable, for example, incitement to racial hatred. "

"as long As you stay within the framework of the legislation you have the right to express yourself, to accommodate whatever views you want, to seek, receive and impart information without interference."

"In theory, is freedom of expression in Sweden. In practice, limping. We, who experienced the bitter experience that it is not possible to accommodate and express what opinions we want or seek, receive and impart information without interference is a growing crowd. "

"more and more often heard demands that individuals with displeasing opinions should be separated from their work and the notifications, with the attendant shutdown of social media is cats and dogs. Malm's argument concerning Hanif Bali (M) is in line with this censurivrande culture. Ore disapprove of Bali's twittering. Why should Bali be silenced. "

"We are moving in a dangerous terrain when we let individual preferences determine what gets said and who gets heard – and it is a matter of concern to representatives of the ideology that most clearly asserts the individual's right to freedom of speech goes the end of censorship case. "

"Malmi rhetoric legitimizes the attack on democracy that is becoming increasingly common. Valstugor on fire and vandalised, the election posters are torn down, political meetings disrupted by talkörer and ballots disappear. These democracy's gravediggers is the same philosophy as Ore: Everything that I dislike should be banned.n n "

" I welcome criticism, discussion and debate – and I despise the attempt to silence anyone whose opinion you do not share. Freedom of expression is a right that should be dealt with in committee, but to identify someone with the muzzle? No."

"nAnn Heberlein, thd phd in ethics, author, parliamentary candidate (M)"

"n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook."

"the Article is a replica. Read the full the debate here - "