Aftonbladet leader board is independent socialist.
How can it be generally accepted that Annie Lööf (C) describe the V as extremists and equate them with the SD card? Why call no cards?\\nAnnie Loof usually have appreciated tours with Jonas Sjöstedt (V) where the debating and gnabbas with each other in front of an audience. The centre party is cooperating in several municipalities with the Left and as far as is known, none of them has developed in the direction of DDR, not in every case.
But the Left may, in principle, be able to withstand anything in the public sphere. They are compared regularly with the communist dictatorships and called undemocratic by the same forces that think it is unfair to remind about SD's ties to Nazi germany.
And not just online. If any invited guests, such as an editorial writer, commenting on the SD in the public service, so says the host of the show often somewhat in the style of ”Jimmie Åkesson is not here and can defend himself”.
I have never heard a similar reservation about the Eu, no matter what is said or how coarse it is. Our publicity has a double standard.\\nJämförelsen between the Left party and The sweden democrats aims to wash away the brown colour from the nyssnazisterna as Andres Lokko cleverly called them in the SvD . Can cooperate with the V so can the Alliance reign with the support of the SD. But it is deeply dishonest. Jonas Sjöstedt want glasögonbidrag to the children. SD does not believe that the jews are the swedes and intend to repatriate people who have already made themselves at home in our country. It is, with all due respect to any risks associated with the glasögonbidrag, not comparable entities.
according to whom the history is dark, the acclaimed Stalin and was far into the postwar threats to democracy. During the cold war, the hunted, the social democrats, the communists are both effective and brutal. IB-the deal is, perhaps, the worst övertrampet but it was, after all, the labor movement, not the right, that held the border against the abyss.
the Left has their demons that can be discussed, but SD is threatening respect for everyone's equal value and liberal democracy in the here and now – there is a huge difference. When the reception burned put SD out addresses on the network to more places. When M in Staffanstorp went in coalition with the SD, it proved that the party's local chairman had links to the paramilitary Soldiers of Odin. Representatives talked openly about the silencing of media, clear the police on political opponents and get rid of the other political parties. In Hungary and Poland is the party of the friends of the reality of the words in this now and on the direct issue preferred Jimmie Åkesson Hungary's authoritarian leader, Viktor Orban ahead of Merkel.
It took the Left from 1917 to 1994 to be accepted as a parliamentary party, among others. They still have not been in any government. With the same mathematics is the SD reasonably well house-trained to 2065. If they start to make up with his history, that is.