/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Don't understand why people on welfare have children: Young liberal generates debate

- There are missing quite a societal perspective. Is it ignorance or blinders?

- If the premise really is that the people themselves choose to be on social assistance and, therefore, are responsible for, whether they are it or not, so it is very easy.


- Why choose all not just to be healthy and rich and eternal youth is also fat.

- it is Also a societal investment that the children are born. Yes, it is a private matter....with the societal consequences.

How to write Pia, L in one of the 96 comments so far) are written to an op-ed in politiken.dk, written by Thomas HN, who is a member of main board of Liberal Alliance Youth in Copenhagen.


In the post wonder why the liberal ungdomspolitiker is over, that people on welfare have children and he tells that he himself has met some kontanthjælpsforældre, which would even have more kids:

- I am genuinely in doubt about what the thought process – or lack thereof – prior to such a decision.

Children of welfare recipients are those who have the least probability to complete an upper secondary education, they do worse in school, etc.

- We know from the statistics that the children of welfare recipients has a high likelihood to end up on the dole, Thomas writes, - although he stresses that he will not prohibit kontanthjælpsbørn - have to look very far for support for his view among the readers of the Danish newspaper politiken.dk

- A bid is that skribentens lack of understanding is rooted in that he believes human action is rooted in economic rationality.


- If it is the starting point, then there must be quite a lot in the world, which is completely incomprehensible :-), writes Jonathan L in his comment, and Nis B use slightly fewer words:

- Nasty reading of an inhumane liberalist!

Quite a few of the comments are positive, but the FR can follow the thinking:

- Believe In honestly that it is for anyone - children or parents - the advantage that children born into poverty, misery and an almost iron-clad status as samfundstaber?

As I read the post, talk that's not to exclude the incidental benefit claimants, but, frankly, if you've already got tvangsfjernet children, what is it then, if not splitterhamrende craze, choosing to get a for?

- Personally, I would never dream of bringing children into this world without a solid economic foundation, but we are perhaps just different.

- Perhaps this is a presentation to the real question: should you really have children for its own sake? (I'm NOT LA's or something similar to it!), write FF, but what are you thinking?

, you Would put a child into the world, while you were on the dole? Yes No do not Know

See result

, you Would put a child into the world, while you were on the dole? 25% Yes 66% No 9% By not

Your vote is received

Show voting

Error occurred unfortunately an error, please try again later.

See also: Single mom seeking julehjælp: Has 8 kr. on the account

Up to d. 14. december brings together gambian and Danish people's aid to the poor Danish children's christmas. And approximately every third of the pt 14.600 applicants receiving cash assistance.

If you or someone you know, need julehjælp, then you can search here. Last year got 9540 single-parent families on public service a julehjælpspakken, which has a value of 1500 kr: A gift card for Rema, a gift card to BR and a gift certificate to the Sportmaster. Which opened for applications last Thursday, and more than 14500 single-parent families have already applied. There is a deadline on Friday. 30. november. the

You can support the collection by sending SMS, mobilepay or bank.

SMS

CHRISTMAS 1999
and steady with 150 kr.

Mobilepay

51 81 11 12

Bank

feel the CHRISTMAS
Reg.no.: 5301
Account no. 0 333 666

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.