Will require new etterforskningsskritt after the crushing verdict

HAMAR, norway (Dagbladet): The former fremmedlegionæren Svein Jemtland (47) received today the smashing verdict in hedmark county: 18 years in prison for the murder of his wife Jane Jemtland.

When tingrettsdommer Trond Christoffersen asked Jemtland if he would adopt the verdict, take the thinking time or appeal of the place, a black 47-year-old particular:

– I anchor the judgment on the spot.

It went a little sigh through the courtroom from the bench Jane Jemtlands relatives set, but Svein Jemtland had decided in advance: it Was the judgment to district attorney Iris Storås had laid down the assertion, would he appeal on the site.

As said, so done.

DOM: Monday dropped the judgment against Svein Jemtland. Video courtesy: TV 2 Show more Not believed

It was no great surprise that this year's most talked about drapssak was appealed after the district court's treatment. Svein Jemtland has refused straffskyld for murder from day one. He claims he was never touching the trigger, that his wife was the threatening and aggressive party with a gun and that the shot went off accidentally.

He was not believed in any of this in hedmark county district court.

"Drapshandlingen emerges as a clean execution with a well-aimed shot right in his forehead. His actions immediately after the murder to hide the tracks, and his upåfallende conduct in relation to the sons and the friends he had contact with, witnesses, so the prosecutor has argued, on a cold and kalkulerende killer", states the verdict.

RELIEF: Janne Jemtlands staying, Peter Opheim, is relieved after the verdict against Svein Jemtland. - It went as I hoped, he says to Dagbladet. Video: hegelstad eiendomsselskap arvid b. hegelstad Mogen Show more

At certain points was ruling almost in line with the district attorney Iris Storås procedure two weeks ago.

After my review, the court has mainly followed the prosecution's assessment of the evidence. He is sentenced for the charges, and he has received a penalty of 18 years. After my assessment, this is a correct judgment, " says Storås to the Newspaper Monday.

Cleaned the gun

It is also known that Svein Jemtland cleaned the murder weapon, a Makarov 9mm reported stolen from a militærlaget in the Czech republic between 1996-199, a short time after the shot was fired. He claims the shot went off when he and Jane fell and that he was never touching the trigger.

Gun-explanations: "What we call a leiemordervåpen"

He also claims that the gun belonged to Jane, and that it was in her nattbordsskuff.

"It is very unlikely that it was Janet that had the gun she was shot with and it is equally unlikely that the gun was in her nattbordskuff, on the night of 29. December 2017. It is also unlikely that Jane accidentally fired the fatal shot", called it in the district court's conclusion.

the Defenders asked several critical questions when våpeneksperter from Kripos testified pistolens functionality. Even if it is determined that the gun that was found 8. may of this year in a wooded area between bristol rovers and Hamar in the years fired the fatal shot, give it a few tracks.

"There is no technical evidence that links the Svein Jemtland to drapshandlingen, but also not something that forces his explanation. The evidence that could have strengthened his explanation, the murder weapon, he has cleaned for any track", called it in the district court's judgment.

Bilregnestykket Defenders flabbergasted with Jemtland-math

To Dagbladet has previously written, however, the prosecution-driven investigation of the case all the way up to tingrettsforhandlingene started in november. The police had among other things studied a stream near Jemtland-the couple's residence where they found a hårstrikk that could not be attributed to Janne Jemtland.

the Police believed then that this could be a relevant place where he had drowned her, but neither they nor the district court have concluded where she has drowned.

When biltekniske experts testified in hedmark county district court, also attempted Jemtlands defenders to cast doubt on studies of driving on the car. Studies show that Svein Jemtland, may not have driven the eight miles from their home in bristol rovers and to the site of the Glomma 29. or 30. December of last year.

Jannes relatives of the sentence: - I haven't completely understood it yet Want new investigation

the Defenders asked a number of questions about possible sources of error in such a reading.

– there Are special etterforskningsskritt you will covet before ankeforhandling?

– Yes, it is enough, but we do not wish to go into detail on right now, " says Jemtlands defender Christian Flemmen Johansen to the Newspaper.

Therefore, appealed he on the spot

What with this, that one does not know when she was transported to the Glomma and where she was drowned?

– There are central moments, which was also central during the procedure, and there is no doubt that it also follows the case against the court of appeal.

There are questions you want answers to?

There are several things we want better illumination in this matter, " he says.

– the Last word is not said

the Lawyer believe there had been an appeal no matter which direction the case had taken in the district court today.

the Paradox in Jemtlands explanation: - What else is there he has not told us?

– He is crystal clear in that he has not done this, and therefore he has availed itself of its right to appeal. The last word is not said here, " he says.

district attorney Iris Storås say that they already now start to prepare ankeforhandlingene in the case, which is expected to come up for the Eidsivating court of appeal in the summer of next year.

the Court admits that one does not quite know where she was drowned and when she was dumped. Is this the thing that will be taken up again?

the Court has obviously been aware of these issues, but says that this is not necessary to take a position in relation to the issue of guilt. It is I agree, " says district attorney Iris Storås to the Newspaper.

– We have read the judgment thoroughly and make an evaluation of the process in the district court, then we'll possibly see if there is a basis to do more work in the case, says Storås.

Svein Jemtlands own words: "It had to be examined if she is I would marry was worthy of" Dagbladet Plus