DN Opinion. The big risk that we get the yellow jackets also in Sweden

The environment policy lacks a socio-economic and social impact assessment. A resident in the suburb of Hjulsta cannot afford to buy expensive solar cells, or a trip to Thailand every quarter.

A villager in Tärnsjö can't charge their electric car with charging stations that do not exist or överkonsumera clothes in the gigantic malls. A construction worker does not have time to stand in the grocery store and scrutinize every food product along a climate profile, or the ability to take public transport to work in the morning for travel time should be at least doubled.

Sweden needs a policy on the environment for all, not just the rich city dwellers. The green party was for airport taxes and high gasoline prices, while the Centre party is hungry for ”green taxation”. None of these reforms will facilitate for low-income or rural residents to be environmentally friendly in their everyday lives.

”green parties” are pushing issues that are strangling the supply of fossildrivna cars to new sales or antibiotikabehandlat meat in our köttdiskar hard enough. Here there is a dissonance between rhetorical policy and practical policy.

When a politician for the green Party or the Centre party for an environmental policy that punishes the part of society that is at the bottom of the food chain, consumers, fattened political contempt at the same rate as The sweden democrats get increased influence. The green party and the Centre party should be reminded of why the politicians are, namely, to enable people's daily lives, not curb it and punish people for trying to live.

The group usually referred to as the ”common people” do not have the money to solar cells, electric powered Tesla cars or organically produced food. The financial resources needed for a conversion of the economic elites.

to legislate to the fossil industries ' disadvantage. Therefore, it would be reasonable to politicians focuses on making fossil fuel companies climate-neutral rather than to punish ordinary honest citizens who do the best they can to not be villains.

does not Change the environmental focus created a fertile ground for the Swedish version of the yellow vests. The government's policy with the higher gasoline prices rather than a ban on the production of fossildrivna cars create a grass-roots discontent.

Reforms need to that the disadvantage of the companies that produces and develops fossildrivna vehicles. Man has always sought freedom to do what it wants, so long as no one gets hurt. Therefore, the car will always be a part of our society, regardless of propellant.

for the eco-conscious politicians to accept the car as a phenomenon and what it means for the citizens of Sweden, Europe and the rest of the entire world. The car has and will always be a symbol of freedom of movement.

Therefore, we can not obstruct the road when the need for transport increases with population growth. Roads are no villains, they keep Sweden on the roller and release the people.

nor is it sustainable for politicians to punish people living in rural areas because of the lack of functioning public transport and need to take the car. It is not reasonable to punish the workers for the that the person did not have the economy to buy a Tesla for half a million when the environmentally friendly public transport takes twice or three times as long to use as a means of transport to and from the workplace compared to a car.

will never car be a rational solution, regardless of the fuel. It simply takes up too much space. A given reform to solve the transport needs of big cities would be a bet on the free use of public transport instead of the rise in gasoline prices that affects other parts of the country's inhabitants negatively.

What are rural to sacrifice in their everyday lives when they are no longer guaranteed a basal välfärdsservice with the employment office, the pharmacy, the BB or the police?