DN Opinion. A government with the S and MP will be just as unstable as M+KD

Ever since the election in september, the Liberal party leader Jan Björklund recurring rejected each of the government constellation that makes itself dependent on the sweden democrats ' active support, essentially for two reasons.

First and foremost, the most famous argument – that the SD represents the values and policies that liberals refuse to concern themselves with.

The second argument follows from the first. When L can not support a government who communicates with the SD would such a government, for example, consisting of the moderate party and the Christian democrats, be very unstable. Prior to each vote during the term of office would this government risk that the SD is voting against, with the crisis in government as a result.

by taking responsibility for Sweden Björklund push for a stable government comes to fruition. With responsibility for Sweden, that beacon has, therefore, Jan Björklund, has guided the Liberals to support a S/MP-government with the agreement that the government should pursue a liberal policy in a number of issues.

S-leader Stefan Löfven can only be prime minister if not to the Party vote received in the statsministeromröstningen on Friday. On Wednesday, Jonas Sjöstedt, at a press conference in parliament, the Left party certainly intend to abstain in the vote, but he signalled that the party should do everything to stop a number of proposals in the agreement between S, MP, C and L. He threatens with misstroendeförklaringar if for V unacceptable decisions are taken in parliament.

Say that the social democrats, the green Party, the Centre party and the Liberals get through the changes in the calculation of rents or labour law, therefore, that the Moderates, the Christian democrats and The sweden democrats are not at the same time voting against. Then V according to Jonas Sjöstedt bring a no-confidence vote against Löfven government.

to V then you will have a good opportunity to get M, the KD and SD and create majority in the parliament. Thus, the government would fall. KD-leader Ebba Busch Thor's statement during his press conference after his meeting with the president, where she open, to remove a S/MP-government, proving my point of view.

Also moderatledaren Ulf Kristersson expressed himself in similar terms. That the SD supports a mistrust of the Leaves, even if it comes from V, is well a real lågoddsare? Moreover, if M, the KD and SD will vote against Löfven on Friday, why wouldn't they make it a bit longer until during the term of office by a vote of no confidence?

My question to the Liberal leader Jan Björklund therefore becomes: Will a S/MP-government that is dependent on V indeed to be more stable than a government with M and KD are dependent of the SD card?