Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

The return of the banana must jolt us all

He never complained, raged, and cried. For all the Aldo Kalulu had reason in the game of his FC Basel against the FC Zürich . As the Frenchman wanted to take

- 19 reads.

The return of the banana must jolt us all

He never complained, raged, and cried. For all the Aldo Kalulu had reason in the game of his FC Basel against the FC Zürich . As the Frenchman wanted to take a corner, he was pelted out of the FCZ-sector with a banana. A gesture that can only be seen as a racist attack on 22-Year-old with Rwandan roots understood.

the return of The banana in the Swiss soccer must not only meet the FCZ, which condemned the action "in the strongest possible terms". You must jolt us all. In all the debates about Fan violence of the last almost always forget: the Swiss club football is managed to distribute the once game daily racism from its stadiums.

All of the unbearable monkey sounds from the stands at the end of the 1980s and the early 1990s. All of the bananas, which in 1990, Basler insulted the FCZ striker August makalaka lane, until he took a bite as self-defense in one of the fruits. 18 years later, the South Africans told: "A weaker Person to stop after such an experience simply to play football. That was the saddest day of my life."

Since then, have changed the Fan curves. You are in Switzerland as a politically neutral and therefore is no longer a place, at the right extreme ideas roared. And now this banana in Basel. It shows that football games are not to be accepted without racism as a given. No, anti-racism needs to be addressed, worked, discussed,. In every football stadium in this world as well as in our everyday life, in which populist politicians like to fight against them so odious political correctness, the boundaries of what is Allowed to weaken further and further.

Just in England, has shared the dark-skinned national players Raheem Sterling, two of the stories in the Daily Mail: Two players buy their mother a house. A title reads: "young star buys for 2 million house for mommy". The other: "Young footballer with a £ 25,000 weekly wage can be no slouch, as he buys 2.5 million in a property for his mother, without ever in the Premier League played." You, who of the two has the whiter skin guess?

racism is formed in a fan curve is not divorced from social currents. But he can, in this clearly defined frame, is prevented. The South Bank is credit for working up the throw from Basel in-house. And to all that are not in a curve, that we turn in the next border spraying of the local politician or the neighbor.

check out this post on Instagram

Good morning I just want to say , I am not normally the person to talk a lot but when I think I need my point to be heard I want to speak up. Regarding what was said at the Chelsea game as you can see by my reaction I just had to laugh because I don’t expect no better. For example you have two young players starting out there careers both play for the same team, both have done the right thing. Which is buy a new house for there are mothers who have put in a lot of time and love into helping them get where they are, but look how the news papers get there message across is for the young black player and then for the young white payer. I think this in unacceptable both innocent and have not done a thing wrong but just by the way it has been worded. This young black kid is looked at in a bad light. Which helps fuel racism to aggressive behaviour, for all the news papers that don’t understand why people are racist in this day and age all i have to say is have a second thought about fair publicity to give all players an equal chance.

A contribution of x divided by Raheem Sterling ???? (@sterling7)

Created: 11.12.2018, 20:16 Uhr

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.