The government's two most criticized matters meet in the ugly society

Two issues that have created most debate after firepartiregjeringens political platform was presented, now confronted each other in the ugly society. TV2 could in the weekend, reported new figures from the St. Olavs hospital in Trondheim, which surprised the doctors at the Center for fostermedisin - the only clinic that performs fosterreduksjon in Norway. Of those who have applied for fosterreduksjon since 2016, it turns out that the whole 66 per cent have become pregnant after fertilitetsbehandling.

Using fertilitetsbehandling can increase the risk for flerlingefødsler. Nevertheless, have you regarded the chance of relatively small, and that the Norwegian hospitals tend to put in only one embryo in connection with fertilitetsbehandling. But because some actors choose a harder stimulation during the treatment, it turns out that this group is overrepresented among those who pray about fosterreduksjon. To perform fertilitetsbehandling abroad, provides even greater risk. At the foreign hospital, it is namely usual to insert between two and four embryos, in order to provide greater probability of successful result. By laying down a veto against egg donation, and refuse single women fertilitetsbehandling, so this government now has made, there are many who are referred to the abroad to receive such treatment. It provides increased risk for flerlingegraviditeter, where the women, in turn, must now meet in the nemd if they want to carry out a fosterreduksjon.

This is true a small number of women. There are 32 women who have applied for fosterreduksjon on healthy fetuses since a lovtolkning opened for this in 2016. 21 of them had received fertilitetsbehandling, six of them by foreign hospitals. We now see, however, that both this innskrenkingen, and the blockage of progress on the bioteknologifeltet pertaining to even more - that egg - affect each other. It illustrates how little thought-out policy is, and how unfit regjeringsforhandlinger is to forge the medical ethical compromises. It emphasizes the unwise in insisting on such a politikkendring, and it explains why the reactions are so strong.

" believe: the christian democratic party has has taken bioteknologiloven hostage Leader