Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Terror suspects deny despite new evidence

the Trial of the six persons accused of different ways of having prepared a terrorist incident in Sweden continued during Wednesday. All of the accused deny t

- 8 reads.

Terror suspects deny despite new evidence

the Trial of the six persons accused of different ways of having prepared a terrorist incident in Sweden continued during Wednesday.

All of the accused deny the crime and during the morning and sakframställningar from two of the defendants lawyers page, it was clear that they both are extremely critical of how some of the initial interrogations conducted, and partly to how the indictment is drafted.

the Prosecutor can't even explain how the preparation for the terrorist incident must have gone to. He has just listed a lot of items that mutually don't have any context, " says attorney Thomas Olsson, who defends a 46-year-old uzbek who is one of the three who stand accused of preparing for terrorist crimes.

He believes that it is illegal to gärningsbeskrivningen is so vague designed:

" We've had a guess, that the prosecutor argue that my client should have planned to make a bomb. So it may not go to, says Thomas Olsson.

yesterday, Tuesday, it submitted, however, chefåklagare Per Lindqvist as, according to him, is new evidence in the case.

They consist, inter alia, of the further extract of the chat in which it transpires that one of the accused, before he bought the chemicals that has been seized, bought detailed instructions on how to manufacture a bomb, and how the man with a stickvapen can kill or seriously harm a human.

the Reason that the evidence presented until now is a ”oversight” of the security service. Any further explanation was not given on Wednesday.

the chats also contain the IS-propaganda consisting of, among other things, photos of prisoners of war, and a film in which prisoners of war executed. The material shows according to the prosecutor, three of the defendants sympathize with the ICE and that they were preparing a terrorist offence. One of the accused also went, in January 2018, in a private group on the messaging service Telegram. It was called ”The holy warrior's weapon.” The actual discussion had the title ”God has created us as muslims and urged us to Jihad”.

" It is deeply unfortunate that, in the midst of the trial, new material. This creates enormous problems, I have not even had time to go through the material, " says lawyer Thomas Olsson whose client because of this is not heard during the Wednesday, even if it was planned.

the lawyer, Kristofer Stahre, who defends a 39-year-old from Kyrgyzstan, believes that the prosecutor has no evidence for their allegations that the defendants planned a terrorist attack. According to them it has not occurred or commenced any manufacturing of explosives:

" My client had no interest in the chemicals he kept. He got them on bought when he bought a konkurslager of color for 200 sek. He tried to sell kalciumhypokloriten to the municipality, that they would be able to make use of it to poolrengöring, " says Thomas Ohlsson.

with respect to the hydrogen peroxide that the prosecutor would claim that the Ohlssons client had access to mean the lawyer that it never even existed any hydrogen peroxide – the can contained, in fact, diesel oil, according to the test results as NFC, National forensiskt center, reports in the preliminary investigation.

in conclusion to everything that has happened, been said and heard; to be seen in a ”IS context”.

– The three who are accused of förberedelsebrottet have IS-the sympathy and the material seized can be used in different ways to perform an attack. A serious assault can be counted as a terrorhandling, says chief prosecutor, Per Lindkvist after the presiding judge asked if he intends to specify gärningsbeskrivning.

Any such clarification will not, however, chefåklagaren do at the moment.

his clients as a construction worker in Sweden. One of them have sought asylum in Sweden after having been subjected to the pressures of his home country's security service. They have, according to the lawyers had not had any intent, on the contrary, they have had ”peaceful intentions”. One of them was in Strömsund to find a woman that his brother would be able to marry, and the money they sent to Turkey have been intended to rent and food to relatives who needed money.

of them put up on the social media by various central locations in Stockholm is no possible targets for terrorist attacks – they have put up to show their friends and acquaintances how it looks in Stockholm:

– Some of the pictures had was also a detail of interest to my client, says lawyer Kristofer Stahre.

it has been stridsselar, stridshandskar, knee pads, bayonets, and walkie-talkies seized, but the accused does not want to acknowledge the things and the lawyers question with emphasis on how they could be used to prepare a terrorist attack:

" I don't want to raljera, but how do you kill someone with a knee? By throwing it on someone?, wonder Thomas Olsson.

comprehensive chats, which occurred via different encrypted instant messengers are the defendants, that very much is misinterpreted and mistranslated. In the chats mean the prosecutor to, inter alia, used the ” wedding” and ”decorate” as code words to plan attacks in Sweden.

The interrogation now underway for the three people charged for preparation to commit terrorist offences. The part of the indictment which covers the financing has not yet been dealt with.

the Trial continues on Monday next week.

the Prosecutor: the Men planned a large-scale attack

Read more: Chatting with the ICE warriors in the trial against terroråtalade

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.