Two letters have been sent to the constitution committee, KU, from the previous managers and officials at the social Insurance office.
The former internal auditor Tamas Osvath, who has worked over ten years in the Insurance wrote one of the letters – where he directs harsh criticism against the Strandhäll.
– Begler did just that the government had given her a mission to do. She did it in a very skilled manner and was well liked also. There were political reasons behind the decision to kick her out, " says Tamas Osvath.
He has also written a debate article in Svenska Dagbladet where he questioned the Strandhälls explanations to petningen.
Read more: Björklund support the motion of censure against the Strandhäll
and has been on the Conservatives the ballot paper in the elections to the municipal council (site 22) in Lund, sweden. It has made fritidspolitikern challenged by several socialists and of the representatives of the government that Expressen has been in contact with.
Pavlos Cavelier Bizas, that the board of directors and kommunfullmäktigeledamot for the social democrats in Uppsala, writes on Twitter:
”One of the letters to the KU, which the Conservatives based their motion of censure against Annika Strandhäll is signed by the Agency's former internal auditor Tamas Osvath. The same person is a moderate local politician in Lund, sweden. Strong case...”https://twitter.com/pavloscavelier/status/1129126337300520966
Tamas Osvath, who today is retired, is surprised that he is being questioned.
" I am a fritidspolitiker for many years and has also served in the municipal council. I am also deputy member of the board of directors for Seniormoderaterna in Lund, " he says.
" Absolutely not. I made this as a fellow human and for that I stand up against injustice. I am moderate has nothing with that to do that I wrote the critical letter to the KU. I feel it is my obligation to step forward when one of these is the obvious infringement, " says Tamas Osvath.
Ewa Stenberg: Video: sacrifice Strandhäll to quickly end the fight?