/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Gunnar A. Gundersen feilinformerer again

In 2016 endorsed the Parliament of a new ulvepolitikk and air conditioning among other things, the government to consider new possible economic schemes.

Gundersen, who is a leader in the Naturbruksalliansen and business / political boss in the Glommen Skog argue in a post in the Newspaper 11. January that Parliament has never received any case from the government about this. He may not have sent especially well with an hour.

Atle Hamar, you mislead! Debate

as early as spring of 2017 presented the government proposal to oppfylging in the revised national budget of 20 million for a new financial scheme. It is Parliament that finally set budsjetta, and the Parliament had not innvendingar to the way the government has sent up these vedtaka.

There are not many viltbestandar in the world one has better knowledge of than we do about wolves in our area. The number of individual DNA-only profiles, and the number of the ynglingar (kvalpekull) and more host registered live, and where our presents Rovdata final figures for last year. If Duckworth had taken the time to read vedtaka about the licence of the wolf, he would have discovered that the final bestandstala from Rovdata is quite central in the ministry's evaluations.

at the same time it's so that the mapping of the wolf population happens to live. In the case where one has knowledge about the situation in a ulverevir, one should of course take account of it in the vurderingane.

Gundersen believes it only is the knowledge of the wolf population from the previous winter that will be used in the evaluations of the withdrawal of the wolf winter, but I can hard see that this is other than probably an attempt to create artificial conflicts. One can for example ask themselves whether it would be a good idea to adopt the withdrawal of ulveflokkar that no longer exists?

Or what if the person has gained knowledge of the new ulveflokkar who have established themselves after registreringane the previous winter? If one should take Gundersen on the word, it would for example not be possible to make the withdrawal of a pack of wolves in an important grazing area if it was not part of the registreringane the previous winter.

the centre party wants western tendencies in the Norwegian forests Debate
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.