The prosecutor in the trial of Bankia rejects the ‘doctrine Loot’ because it ensures that the damage was collective

attorney Carmen Thean defended this Wednesday the presence of the charges particular in the judgment of Bankia. After the attorney for the entity and others to accuse of not having accredited what losers they represent and not be formulated properly for your accusation, Thean launched a cable at the third session of the trial of the associations of small shareholders by claiming that they are legitimate and that the violation that caused the output to Bag of Bankia was "collective".

MORE INFORMATION

Bankia says he does not know what he is accused and try to expel the judgment the investors, who have charged the office of The Prosecutor envisages strengthening its accusation against the dome of Bankia, While returns to the bench for the output to Bag of Bankia

Thean settled the controversy regarding the possible application of the doctrine of Booty, defense attorneys are invoking in all its interventions and assumes that, when the Prosecution makes no indictment against someone and there is no hurt direct, you can't prosecute. In the opinion of the public prosecutor anti-Corruption, both the accusations popular as the individuals should continue in the process because the damage that caused the output to Bag of Bankia was "more than relevant", and the alleged false accounting has affected the whole of the Spanish financial system and caused the largest bailout in the History of Spain, which amounted to 23.465 million, lastró the price of the IBEX and shot the risk premium.

in Front of the request of the lawyer of Bankia, Joaquín Burkhalter, of expel the particular that the bank considers are not legitimized (in the Wipbet second session of the trial stated that only 205 people are, in front of the thousands of claimants that there is), the prosecutor responded that the rebuttal of those allegations should have been done when they came and not now, notwithstanding that during the test phase of the trial, these people have to demonstrate those damages. "Bankia and BFA were there, they were able to do," he said. Defenses maintain that the only one harmed in the ipo was the FROB, which owns 61% of Bankia.

threats of the defense attorneys during the first few days of the trial, which ensured that they would ask explicitly for the costs of the accusations without legitimacy, have had some effect, since at least one association, the Aemec (Spanish Association of Minority Shareholders of Listed Companies) has already announced that it welcomes the offer of Bankia to return all affected you ask for the investment, plus interest of 1% per annum. When this happens, they will abandon the process.

the president of The court, judge Angela Murillo, announced Wednesday that Thursday will be the last session of the trial this year, which means that the statements will not begin until January 8 next. Before that, the court must decide on prior issues raised by the lawyers of the defenses.

For the moment, formally the Prosecution only accused of the crime of fraud to investors to the ex-president of Bankia, Rodrigo Rato, the former ceo of Bankia, Francisco Verdú and the councillors José Manuel Fernández Norniella José Luis Olivas. But the first day of trial, announced that he was studying accuse them (to them and to the rest of the 34 processed) of another crime, false accounting.