" />
Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Who gives in the Arena the largest vote-clutter

The weekly Political show "Arena" has the ambition, the political debates in Switzerland, particularly accurately. Parliament and the Public, trade unions and

- 15 reads.

Who gives in the Arena the largest vote-clutter

The weekly Political show "Arena" has the ambition, the political debates in Switzerland, particularly accurately. Parliament and the Public, trade unions and employers, Federal councillors and parish presidents – all of them should be able to discuss at eye level. The mission makers, however, have to live with the accusation that only the shrill tones of the political establishment; and that it is not really about to give all political Parties an equal discussion stage, but to promote those who offer a controversial political Slogan.

A note on the quality of the conversation of culture, the number of moments in which it comes to the voice confusion. This happens per shipment in average of six times. The content analysis of all the subtitles of the "Arena shows". None of the guests to hear in this Chaos-phase is more, everybody talks of it, while the presenter is waving your arms and after procedure calls. For the last five years, the Jonas Projer fact. 17. May he be replaced by his successor, Sandro Brotz.

Six times a confusion of per shipment in the section is from the point of view of the audience probably manageable. On request, the Swiss television pointed out that a mess-Talk in each interview situation could occur.

however, There are a number of "Arena"-broadcast, which is very different from this average. Especially, if the SRF invites the SVP-politicians, Christoph Blocher . The former chief strategist of the largest party in Switzerland was in the last three years, seven times in the "Arena". With him, the value soared high, an average of 11 stages, in which the other listened to it. In the show, "Blocher – on to the last battle" from 9. March 2018 talking to the guests a total of 22 Times in a mess. In addition to Blocher , the Philipp Müller , the former FDP Chairman (AG), Cédric Wermuth , SP-Nationalrat (AG), and Camille Roth, President of the young SVP (ZH).

It was in the political discussion on the EU economic policy. Especially Wermuth and Blocher with each other broke in again and again with long between. The program ended with Blocher, wanted to stop not to talk until the Moderator called Projer desperate: "Now a round of applause for all, for Switzerland, we are, in fact, all of you."

The SRF of a brockt this to yourself. Blocher does not appears only as a guest, but is also regularly yourself on the topic. For example in the program "Blocher against all" from the 22. By September 2017. In this appeal, it came to 17 Times longer interruption phases. The shipment of 4. November 2016 was the name of Blocher in the title. However, the broadcast of "Who was running the country?" in a confrontation with Blocher and his ideas. This Time, the controversial German AfD-politician, Alexander was invited Gauland; Tiana Moser, GLP-national councillor (Canton of Zurich) and Eric Nussbaumer, SP-Nationalrat (BL). Also in this shipment 17 burst-Time Chaos.

But Blocher is not alone for the mess in the "Arena". For a lot of votes-Chaos is also the choice of Donald Trump as US President in November 2016. In the weeks after the surprising election victory of the U.S.-billionaires, the "Arena"-the editors invited several times to the appropriate Talk-round: On 18. November 2016, about on the topic of "capitalism or class struggle – What are the recipes of the Left against Trump?" a week earlier, "Why is Trump?". In these shipments, it came up 21 Times, respectively, 13 Times to voice the confusion.

it is Well possible that the Season plays a role. The analysis shows that in November, the voice of confusion in the "Arena" is on the rise. The year is coming to an end. In General, important voting dates. Also the shipment with the greatest voice falls in a mess at all in this time of the year. It is the consignment "Bought votes" in the run-up to the transparency Initiative. It came with 31-Time to a voice of confusion; a tangle almost every two minutes.

To the discussion, the transparency of the presidential fundraising fight. Hardly any of the guests Claudio Zanetti, Zürcher SVP-Nationalrat Hans-Peter Portmann, the Zurich FDP national councillor, the Journalist Otto Hostettler, President of the Association Lobby lobby watch, and the Zurich BDP national councillor Rosmarie Quadranti had presented itself, los talking to you – all at the same time. To talk the most time undisturbed, only the comedienne Patti Basler got to the very end. You summed it up in a Slam of the conversation of the guests.

The SRF says, shipments of factual, time emotional. The sun in the nature of the shipment. And further: "Therefore, it needs strong Moderation, which engages, when the discussion gets out of control. This is not to say, however, that you have to disconnect any Emotion, and the conversation up to a certain degree, not even his free rein."

A look at the items with cleaner, more discussion of gradients shows, however: There are quite a recipe against the voices-the confusion, apart from that, Christoph invite Blocher something less. If a Federal Council was invited to the show, the mess is significantly less. To five moments per shipment. It was a Federal councillor Doris Leuthard, or Simonetta Sommaruga – drops of the vote-confusion-cut to under four per shipment. Alone, the authority of the Federal councillors and, apparently, even your gender in the "Arena", apparently, for a proper discussion of relationships.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 02.05.2019, 18:51 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.