Runar Sögaards defense after the imprisonment: Dad can free me

"Runar Sögaards defense after the imprisonment: Dad can free me"

"the Preacher was convicted of false accounting and tax offences"

"Runar Søgaard was sentenced against his denial to 20 months in prison."

"But his lawyer said that the judgment should be appealed and that the father should testify – in order to free his son."

"– He had important tasks to leave and now he's not with it in the case, says lawyer Leif Gustafson."

"the Verdict against Runar Søgaard, 51, was announced on Thursday."

"your Profile was sentenced to 1 year and 8 months' imprisonment for three cases of serious accounting fraud and 20 cases of tax evasion. He was acquitted, however, of forgery, but was stopping in five years."

"According to the Nacka district court has Runar Søgaard been careless with the books and records by failing to post revenue of millions of dollars over three years."

"”the Offences are serious because the crime intended substantial amount, occurred systematically over several financial years and carried out in the tax avoidance purpose”, writes the law in the judgment."

"But the profile refuses to crime and claims that he has not been responsible in the company. He also stated that he is not known to the errors in the records or skatteredovisningen."

"Defense evidence: the Father"

"to prove that the profile has not been responsible for the financial statements requested the defence of his father, who sits in the company's board of directors, would testify during the trial."

"– You requested a new hearing with the father, but the district court rejected it, " says Leif Gustafson, Runar Sögaards lawyer."

" We think it is a wrong decision and result, the district court chose to hear the case in a way that was not acceptable. He had important tasks to leave and now he's not with it in the case."

"Has the father of the data you mean to free Runar Søgaard?"

"– Yes, the data has importance for who has the responsibility for the company."

"the Lawyer stated that his client is dissatisfied with the judgment and that it will be appealed to the Svea court of appeal."

"– He denies the crime and do not think that it was a right judgment and will therefore appeal against it. Otherwise he leaves himself not any comments."