Local progress party politician accused Erna for treason. - I take it not very heavy, says Jon Engen-Helgheim

Monday was the Un migrasjonspakt adopted by akklamasjon during the UN conference in Marrakech, Morocco. Norway joins, but the progress party has taken dissent. The charter will set the framework for international cooperation to deal with all forms of migration, but is not legally binding.

Still, it has faced massive opposition. The temperature was so high on Erna's Facebook wall, that she saw herself forced to close gjesteveggen Thursday.

"basically it should be a high threshold to remove the speech, but I can not allow threats and harassment against other people," she wrote in a post on Facebook.

One of those who shared Erna's post about migrasjonspakten and why the government adheres to it, was the deputy chair in Arendal Frp, Maurith Julie Fagerland.

"You engage in a game of chance with our country and the generations to come that are worse than the ones that did fraterniserte with the germans," writes Fagerland.

"the Warnings shotguns, not only from people, but from professionals. To then run further without slowing, despite all the pitfalls which is contained in this agreement is direct treason!", she quit the post.

- I put it on the tip

You can say that I tried to appeal to our prime minister. I know I used a strong instrument and I hope still that it can come something good out of this, type Fagerland in an SMS to Dagbladet.

She is among other things concerned for the loss of selvråderett, and refers to the right's dissent in the case.

I put this on the tip. The consequences are outlined to be able to be heavier than what many, including the prime minister, will admit, she writes.

progress party's immigration spokesperson Jon Engen-Helgheim believe that much of it as stood on Erna's wall before it was closed, it was constructive criticism. He understands the strong reactions against the government.

I would not called it treason even, but I understand that people are frustrated. If more had dared to speak openly of this agreement at an earlier time, so had may not the people become so desperate, says Helgheim to the Newspaper.

- What do you think about that union representatives in the Frp uses the words "treachery" in this case?

Contested migrasjonspakt adopted at the UN meet

- We need to stop going after people because of the word of god and twists. I understand that people are frustrated, but encourage them to stay on a factual level. I take it not very heavy, " he says.

Frp-deputy chairman Sylvi Listhaug is not as responsive.

- to be called landssviker should be restricted to such as Vidkun Quisling. We must manage to discuss without resorting to the type of stamping of the opponents, she writes in an email to Dagbladet.

asked about the report

Thursday will the government give an account of the pact in the Parliament. Helgheim warns that there will come a proposal from the progress party of Norway is not to be joined with yet.

- We are against it because it is an overarching objective that the immigration should be made easier and that you will allow forms of immigration that is now illegal, says Helgheim.

Helgheim refers to the goal number seven in the covenant, where it says that one should make sure to facilitate the transition from illegal to legal status.

Erna Solberg closes Facebook-wall

- In practice, this means it to make illegal immigrants into legal, says Helgheim.

Director for Norway's national institution for human rights, Adele Matheson Mestad, believe Helgheim have perceived the target error.

- This goal is about how one can limit the migrants ' vulnerability and safeguard their human rights. One of the measures is to ensure that migrants who are to be irregular in a country can get processed their applications and get regular status when there is a basis for it, " she says to Dagbladet.

She emphasizes that the selection procedure, nevertheless, will follow the national rules of Norway.

- This is not a legally binding agreement, and not impose on the states any new obligations, nor to liberalizing her speech. The platform is based on the principle that it is a part of the states 'sovereignty to determine who shall be granted stays in each country," says Mestad.

- the Uk should embrace the Un migrasjonspakt Comment