the Message in Annika Anastassious letters to the editor on the DN Opinion (3 may) with the title ”Stop glorifying the hunting of prime-time” answers the general secretary of the hunters association Stay Shield with vapenterminologi. He writes that, ”träffbilden is somewhat unclear” and that her term ”in the firing line” testifies to the ignorance.
the Language härskarteknik can not diminish the fact that the capacity for compassion is an ideal, not ignorance. By killing compassion with the animals, we kill something in ourselves.
When a female hunter call a wounded bear for the ”björnjävel” in SVT's series ”Jaktliv” and you release another dog ”to bring pressure on the bear” is clarified animal cruelty and sadismen. The animals in the ”Jaktliv” exploited as a kind of lyxnarrar for teknikgenerationen and hunters association is clapping hands for the countryside.
at Linköping university, stresses that, in order to be able to exercise military force, it is necessary to dehumanize the enemy. He takes the example of the kind of tongue-in-cheek jargon that occur in the crews of the bombers to trivialise the bombandet, ”there goes the cookie”. The dead become mere numbers in the statistics.
Oppression is based on a collective avtrubbningsprocess, but also an individual - that when the secretary-general Bo Shield reduces the geese and birds to an ”effective, efficient and sociable”.
Birger Schantz, former professor of veterinärkirurgi, has said: ”To say that animals do not feel pain after the shot is cynical. No one can say that a pushed animal does not suffer. What we do know is that the nervous system perceives pain looks similar in all mammals”.
for you to do as evil on an animal. What is it that gets 3% of the population to want to risk suffering for other creatures? The desires of the flesh power?
Since the time of Aristotle's the art of war a way to dominate and acquire property. Hunting was a part of the art of war.
To be a man was to hunt and wage war; to own slaves and to bid on the animals as the meat became power symbols. The meat was well into our time to make men aggressive and virile.
Henrik Ennart, has noted: ”When vildsvinsstammen increases due to feeding and landowners to make money nöjesjakt it is about something else. It is the killing that attracts – not the flesh”.
”Climate-smart meat” slain with the blyammunition (despite kemikaliemyndighets warnings) during the violent hunting methods that cause the wild animals the same adrenalinpåslag as for slaughter animals need safe glorifieras. Is possibly ”Jaktliv” a product placement of the hunter association?
the Industry around hunting generates big money. Advanced krigsteknik in the hands of a new generation troféjägare without ethics do that many from the ancient tribe of hunters do not recognize themselves.
learn to have an opinion that hunting is the war's little brother. On the issue of hunting's future, he replied that ”it is a highly dubious employment to kill animals for his pleasure”. But as long as the than will hunters association, with access to closed rooms in the parliament, to use their many millions of dollars a year to consolidate härskarstrategin of our common fauna.
The faceless mass called the ”sustainable resource” where the ideological disguise is in the word ”wildlife management”. Not care as nursing, without that exploitation, which is equal to the killing.
Adelsmärket for Jägareförbunden is not animal welfare. It contents itself with an outdated hunting party that ”does not cause the animals unnecessary suffering”.
whose life ends prematurely after a stressful hundjakt, ran, underground work, as firearm injuries is not forced to suffer? Which animals want to see their kids killed and cut up in front of your eyes?
Researchers have found that boys more than girls need to learn empathy. In Sweden is characterized instead children to kill animals at the age of 15.
Grew up on an estate with hunting, I can say that the development that degenerated into a trophy - and nöjesjakt on animals is not only mass extermination, but soul-destroying.