/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

DF praised the deal yesterday - bitching today

yesterday praised the Danish people's Party, agreement on tougher action against corona infection among immigrants, which the party itself has written on.

the Agreement was 'fine', wrote the DF's group chairman Peter Skaarup on Twitter.

But already today, calls for the Danish people's Party answer to what the agreement entail in concrete terms.

It happens after a news conference with prime minister Mette Frederiksen (S).

- It is very fine, Mette Frederiksen says that there is a problem with the infection among non-western immigrants. But it is totally absent, how is the government then going to take the here infection'an, says Skaarup.

the Parties in the blue block struck during the negotiations to the sound, that there needs to be more consistency, if people do not comply with a corona-quarantine.

But the government has already allowed. And it did not blue block to get the government to - for example - to use leg irons to keep the infected people in quarantine.

- We did come up with some pretty accurate suggestions. That we should have electronic fodlænke for infected individuals, that violate the rules. How to some cash thing was something that we would like to hear from Mette F. But it came nothing about.

- You wrote yesterday on Twitter, that the DF's 'massive pressure' to put into the opposite smittekæder in specific groups, had succeeded. How does it relate to your criticism now?

- well, it managed to get the government to acknowledge it here problem. But, we could not get the government in on, was the exact thing that I mention. But we could not get the government to write down.

- You wrote: "Fine coronaaftale in place. Our massive pressure to put in face in special groups - along with the other blue parties - managed". But it sounds not as if it has succeeded, if you have no idea, how that is to be deployed across the specific groups?

- Yes, it managed to get written: the competent Authorities must therefore have a focus on putting targeted against specific groups, which, at a given point in time fill the particular in the statistics.

- But what is it worth if there isn't something concrete?

Yes, but then it says that also... now I just have to see here: 'Respected selvisolation not, steps can be taken to isolate the infected by the use of the injunction according to the applicable law', refers Skaarup among other things, from the text of the agreement.

- But all your suggestions about fodlænke, forsamlingsforbud in the ghettos, the obligatory use of mundbind in contrast, it has been poured down the drain, so how can the coronaaftale, In is with in is referred to as "fine"?

- No I would not say that they are poured down the drain. The government is just not willing to write down the use of the initiatives. To make it, will be up to the authorities. It is stated in the agreement.

But authorities have don't all the time had the option?

- Yes, it has the. Therefore, there is no, they do not have in the here epidemilov - it is also very deep - the problem is just, if you don't use it.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.