Convicted of sexual abuse via the internet get reduced penalties

unlike the district court modifies the court of appeal headings in several cases, and judge the man for the serious exploitation of children for sexual posering. The district court sentenced him for child rape, and serious sexual abuse.

he previously was convicted of rape, he has not ”participated” when the girl played in movies, in her loneliness, which she then sent to him. The district court argued that the instructions he sent to the girl could be perceived in another way.

Prosecutor Andreas Ekengren who pushed the case against the man have claimed the title ”child rape” when he thinks that the events are consistent with the Supreme court's (HD's) assessment.

– There is a precedent from the Supreme court late last year to discuss what is required in order to subject it as child rape, " said the prosecutor to TT.

"the Question is, in principle, interesting, but my instinctive view is that this objective may not be suitable for a trial in HD," says Andreas Ekengren.

they are good and well written. The court of appeal deems that the crime against this particular plaintiff is very serious and straffvärd.

the Man has approached young girls via various online forums and have by threats and enticements persuaded them to perform various acts of a sexual nature. He has been in contact with the girls had lied about his identity and age.

the Man has undergone a psychiatric examination. But the opinion travelling is no obstacle to judging the man to prison.

the Man was convicted of a total of 120 offences against the 62 plaintiff. The crimes have occurred from 2015 to the beginning of december 2017. The court of appeals writes that the man shown ”great ruthlessness”, several of the abuse has been going on for weeks or months. No mitigating circumstances have come to light during the trial.

the Man is previously convicted of similar sexual offences on four occasions.