Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


Klassförräderi is not valvinnare, S

the LAS investigator, Gudmund Toijer, is not very good on the balance sheet. He argues that the försämringarna the safety of the employees, would be offset by a modest adjustment in the option of fixed-term employees to get the job, and investments in training and skills development. The LO, the TCO and the Swedish confederation of professional Associations make a counter-assessment, the LAS-the commission's proposal would drastically alter the balance of power in the Swedish labour market. It also means that in the investigation the flagrant violation of the januariavtalets the requirement to ”balance” must be preserved.

the LAS-the investigating officer did not realize, either, that a deterioration in the employment protection legislation undermines the focus on skills development. To introduce more and more exceptions to the turordningsreglerna, and the freedom of the employer, in companies with up to 15 employees, to lay off employees slowed down the training of the employees. It will be more profitable for an employer to lay off employees and replace it with a new one, in the context of changes in technology. In particular, the number of older people getting out of the job market. For many of them, it would be hard to get back into the workforce. The number of long-term unemployed, older workers could be increased.
Create more jobs
nor there is support for that is a lack of labour laws could create jobs. Research from research institute, IFAU, it shows, rather, that the effect would be an increase in the turnover of the staff. More of them would be out of a job, and more people would have jobs. Once again, the effect would be that the older ones were, and that the reliability is increased.

the Proposal has not been retained, but with a högersmocka directed toward wage and salary earners ' employment protection legislation and union organizing.

the LAS-the commission's proposals would have very far-reaching effects on small businesses. The ability to be able to appeal dismissals for personal reasons, and the disappearance of the enterprise, with up to 15 employees. The inquiry is referring, however, to the impact of the redundancies would be open to legal challenge, with the support of, among other things, anti-discrimination act. However, according to the LAS, it is the employer who must prove that the termination is done on a factual basis, but it is the individual who will be responsible for the evidence according to the anti-discrimination act. The burden of proof would be reversed, which means, in practice, the weaker the protection for the employee. Disastrous for the unions

this is the LAS of incentives for the small business owner to sign a collective bargaining agreement. If an agreement exist, the employers and the trade unions to agree on a deviation from the law. If the employer has concluded a collective agreement is not possible. With very little employment, especially in small companies, the disappearance of these incentives. A likely effect would be that the collective agreement in the case of smaller companies, the principle was wiped out. However, it would also lead to a decrease in the interest of workers to form and join labor unions. In the long term, this could have a negative impact on the Swedish model. On the contrary, the rhetoric of the investigator, is not a proposal in a balanced way, without a högersmocka directed toward wage and salary earners ' employment protection legislation and union organizing.
the Eternal conflict of interests
the LAS report is written in a supposed spirit of the existence of a solution to the issue of the employment law, which is neutral, is the best for all of you. Yes, there are common interests between employers and employees, for example, the win-win of both of the companies are well-maintained. However, there are also conflicts of interests will arise. The labour law is a case in point. Employers want to to to increase the the freedom to lay off employees, while employees want job security. In order to move forward we must recognize that it is a question of a tug-of-war. There is a conflict of interest, which is eternal, and which LAS are to a basic level of protection for workers ' safety.
the Labour party as a thing of the past.
The rising of the conflict of labour law itself. There is a lot at stake. Weak security of tenure is a means to get the employees to keep silent and to create the weakness of the trade unions. In the worst case, the Centre party and the Liberal party, to require that the commission's proposals are to be voted on. Then there will be a fight. As we will show in our review, which is being released today, the LAS-the commission's proposals are a breach of the januariavtalet. Therefore, the government must stop, humma, and the firm cast, the LAS-the commission of inquiry into the recycle bin. Otherwise, the social Democrats ' strong support of the arbetarväljarna is a thing of the past. < / span> < / span>

the Head of the trade union of the idéinstitutet Catalysis.

Independent journalist and analyst, who, in the day of the release of the report ”the Attack on job security. A critical review of the LAS, the”, which is to be found in the katalys.org

READ MORE: , Suhonen & Granholm: You are such a chance, when the F-check-out says ' no ' READ MORE: , Who is going to vote in favour of the welfare state will be destroyed?

READ MORE: , the Call to the home of Hakan He is, and scared the S out of the avgrundenHemliga kärleksparen Robinson: ”Heat up,”

Julia reveals the relationships • ”Going off into the woods, and the low.”

Lidstrom: ”I have asked for it to be removed”
Hockeyikonen takes away from the CARE – for THIS s documentary So much in serving the coronaprofilerna
Has become a popular television favorites • Miljonavtal of the FHM Thousands of people in the manifestation in Stockholm, sweden

is being Investigated by the prosecutor's office: ”To have held hearings”.

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.