Political scientist: Tentative debate in the new landscape

"Political science: Tentative debate in the new landscape"

"there is No hardware conflict shown between the former Alliansvännerna, rather a competition about who is responsible for the most bourgeois politics. At the same time get the Left new air in his free role as critics on the left, notes the political scientist Jonas Hinnfors."

"Partiledardebatten clearly shows that the political landscape has changed, like Jonas Hinnfors, professor of political science at Gothenburg university."

"We have three groups of parties now, those who are for the government, those who are against it and those who are for the agreement between the government and the C and L. It will be very interesting to see how this evolves," he says."

"No one wants to smear the Alliance."

"He describes the debate as a bit tentative, and caution in the attacks probably are quite well considered. From several directions."

" You could see no trace of the Alliance in the day, there was no attempt to breathe life into it."

"Fixed neither M and KD or C and L trampled down the fragments of the bursting of the Alliance in the dirt – maybe they want to keep a small aperture to cooperate again."

"– It was interesting to Ebba Busch Thor took the replica on Annie Lööf, and to Annie Lööf selected then. But it was not so powerful criticism."

"Now it becomes a bit of a competition about who is the most right-wing, between Conservatives and christian Democrats on the one hand, and the Centre party and the Liberals, on the other, he thinks."

" the– C and-L can show up the agreement and say that they get through the bourgeois political issues, while M and KD claims that they are the real citizens."

"Jimmie Åkesson (SD) tried to capture the Moderates and the Christian democrats in a högerkonservativt block, but it is disliked."

"– Ebba Busch Thor jumped not on the initiative, she indicated that the KD is christian democratic. But Jimmie Åkesson want to capture them in a högerkonservativt routes that they feel the need to alienate themselves from."

"the Lukewarm repudiation"

"at the same time was the Moderates and the Christian democrats a little lukewarm in its opposition against SD, he thinks."

"– Yet they do not want to show clearly that they make common cause with the SD. However, they did not reply to Jimmie Åkesson."

"in all, the debate on a new mode of politics, where the konfliktlinjerna are not entirely clear. S, MP, C and L are connected together sakpolitiskt, and then there will be not much to the opposition. Maybe, just maybe can the Alliance bring new life sometime in the future, and then no mark is too hard on old friends. Lojaliteterna is simply tentative, like Jonas Hinnfors."

"Freedom on the left wing."

"The who, however, received a completely new freedom in the political landscape is Jonas Sjöstedt, he thinks."

"– He need not hold back, he can be harsh in their criticism of the government, and he was also in the debate in the debate. He took out the turns properly."

"For the first time it gets a little tricky with the criticism," he says. Video: must try and get used to the all new dynamic, then V is no longer a to some extent due as in the past, and with the agreement with C and L."

"– Jonas Sjöstedt did not get so much back from Stefan Löfven. It is not all that easy for the Leaves to defend themselves, he spoke a lot about a whole and to take responsibility instead of saying something specific. He does not know how hard he will fight against the V, " said Jonas Hinnfors."