Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured G7 Minimal Kemba Walker Jack Nicklaus Ange Postecoglou Postmaster General DeJoy

reads.

Opel was not enough: VUC-employees chose Bmws to 5500 per month

- If you could choose between an expensive and inexpensive lease agreement, and you then choose the expensive agreement, so travel it is of course the question of whether you have demonstrated the appropriate economy of the public funds.

How to say Per Nikolaj Bukh, professor of financial management at Aalborg University, to the SOUTH of the 6 BMW's the scandal hit AT the South, have leased to their employees. the

the School's sea view contains also 8 Opel cars, and because BMW's cost more than twice as much as Opel's, believes the professor, that the school management has acted in accordance with the principles found in the public sector to exercise due economy. A Opel costing 2400 dkk per month - a BMW costs 5500 per month:

- If you have a large kørselsbehov, then I would normally imagine it to run in a leased car of a cheaper brand and a customize small size, should be competitive to have to pay the mileage allowance for employees ' own car, continues the professor, who think that they are expensive cars - in the context of the revelations about the school's Apple Watches, designermøbel, travel and sponsorship contracts - draws a picture of a management that needs worrying a lot of money:

- I can't help to look at some of the other stories, so there is a pattern, which appears to not have had a need to demonstrate the economy, as we know from other parts of the public sector, " says the professor.

Acting director Vinnie Lerche Freudendal according to DR SOUTH explained that the management has chosen to maintain the car out of consideration for employees and environment and for marketing reasons, as the cars are running with VUC Syds logo, but what do you mean?

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.