/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook
Featured Hot News

reads.

DN Opinion. The forest is better at storing carbon dioxide than norwegians

It takes for the boiler. Now to our western neighbour, induce Sweden and other countries to deliver carbon dioxide for storage, down under the seabed, where the oil previously pumped.

according to a DN report (21 march) so expensive and energy-intensive that you need to get outside support for it to become profitable. Liquid carbon dioxide shall be delivered from the rest of Europe with the ships, which so far runs on fossil oil.

Norway, which has become the world's richest country by pumping up oil and made a significant contribution to the climate change we now must act urgently to tackle, seeing now a new business idea when oljeepoken seem to go against its end.

method for carbon dioxide capture. The nature has itself invented and offers without large overhead costs.

Our Swedish forests, is at your service. Prudent forest management and reforestation trumps all the high-tech, extremely expensive methods of carbon storage.

Bet your money on forest owners instead.

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.