Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

WADA experts return to Moscow

Three experts from the WADA arrive in Russia on Wednesday. They should make a new attempt to collect data from the skandalebefengte antidopinglaboratoriet in Mo

- 11 reads.

WADA experts return to Moscow

Three experts from the WADA arrive in Russia on Wednesday. They should make a new attempt to collect data from the skandalebefengte antidopinglaboratoriet in Moscow.

It informs the World antidopingbyrå on their websites.

Before christmas had five WADA experts journey home from the Russian capital with uforrettet case. The Russian authorities said that the experts have the equipment to extract the data were not approved by the country's laws.

In the press release that WADA sent out Monday, the russians promised that these problems have now been cleared off the road.

Russia's antidopingbyrå (RUSADA) had been set as a deadline to give WADA within the end of full access to previous data and samples from the previous antidopinglaboratoriet in Moscow. It never happened, and it has created strong reactions in the antidopingmiljøet all over the world.

In the fall asked WADA several requirements to RUSADA to take the agency back in the heat again. It awakened great joy in the Russian federation and ditto outrage in other countries then the Russian that anti-doping authorities was incorporated as a full WADA-member again. It happened after the russians had been outside in three years after the revelations about the extensive dopingjuks.

Russian shooting stars living in the city that are closed to the doping inspectors Can still be banned

Although an expert group is now traveling back to Moscow, underlines the WADA president Craig Reedie that it means that you look through your fingers that Russia broke the agreement, which was concluded in september.

- We will continue to work after the deadline 31. December was not complied with and the consequences it can provide. This week's mission in Moscow is not just about following a process. If the data collection is successful, it could potentially lead to many issues, " says Reedie and continues:

Regardless, the board will in the short term consider whether RUSADA shall retain its status as a full member.

Petitions

The independent committee for the regeletterlevelse shall meet 14. 15. January to make a recommendation to the WADA-board of directors of Russia's idrettsframtid.

In a petition demanded the whole of the 16 national antidopingbyråer in the last week that it is taken a decision as quickly as possible.

It has been several years now without that it has been cleaned up. Now in september gave WADA them a ekstraomgang that they are not deserved, and it didn't take RUSADA care of. Now, you must soon say that the door is closed. Therefore, it is important that we now say so, said managing director Anders Solheim in anti-doping Norway to NTB.

Norway in dopingopprop against Russia Drag

WADA banned RUSADA in november 2015 after McLaren-the report documented widespread and myndighetsassistert dopingjuks in the years 2011 to 2015. Central in this was antidopinglaboratoriet in Moscow.

the Lack of access to data from the Moscow laboratory has been a drag in the attempt to quiet the guilty to responsibility for the dopingjukset. In February, rezoned this sport voldgiftsrett (CAS) penalties against 28 of the 43 Russian idrettsfolkene that of the IOC was disqualified and banned for having contributed to and profited from dopingjukset.

So far only two international federation athletics (IAAF) and biathlon (to ibu), initiated disciplinary cases based on the information in the McLaren report. The IAAF has since november 2015 denied the russians participation in the international competitions, except the hand-picked sportsmen who have to compete as neutral athletes.

Skjebnedager for the Russian cross-country skiing: Is there someone who know what is happening?
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.