Uefa's declaration to the United WAS-punishment

"the Uefa statement to the United WAS-punishment"

"Backs referee after controversial decision"

"the PSG railed against Manchester United WAS-punishment."

"Now explains the Uefa how the judge's reasoning."

"”the Hit on the arm could not be considered unexpected”, they write in a statement."

"Manchester United accounted for a miracle, and turned 0-2-disadvantage against PSG despite the fact that the missing ten (!) player. The turnaround was completed via a late tilldömd WAS-a punishment that was Paris-the team to crumble."

"Now let's go Uefa out and defends the referee, Damir Skomina."

"They mean that he took the right decision."

"”After having seen the situation in the event the judge (Damir Skomina) confirmed that the ball had not traveled a short distance, and the hit, therefore, could not be considered unexpected. The defender's arm was not close to the body, making the body larger, with the result that the ball's direction towards the goal was stopped. Therefore, blew the judge for punishment,” writes Uefa in a statement."

"the Situation in the Roma match."

"WAS controversial even in the match between Porto and Roma. Where wanted the italians to have penalties at the end of the match when Roma's Patrik Schick fell in the offensive penalty area, but domarteamet chose to be free."

"”Videodomarna did not consider that any clear and obvious breaches of the rules had occurred and found no basis for the use of WAS,” writes Uefa, according to TT."

"✓ See more highlights on viafree.and see the matches live, or 48 hours afterwards on viaplay.see"