The last yellow Ball is played, the Tennis rests short, and Roger Federer is out of town for two weeks in the holidays. However, in Switzerland, he excites the minds. Mr Andreas Tobler joined in the criticism of his tour of South America last week and believes the Swiss flagship athletes debunked (click here for the article). Be a "Teflon Image" have cracks, it was "obscene" that he would show to protest fighting in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico withholding and tens of millions of dollars abkassiere, meanwhile, on the streets against social unrest.
Now that the tour was planned before the mass erupted protests in Chile, Colombia and Ecuador. Federer had no political Agenda, could not be exploited for performances of governments. He played simple Tennis, because people want to see him play Tennis. The Sport is in South America, very popular, but the continent is in Tennis, almost a white spot. Here are just six tournaments in the two lowest ATP levels are held. For many of Federer's guest performance was the only Chance to see him ever live. They took them true – all of the games were sold out.
it Would have contributed to the solution of social problems in Latin America, if he would have canceled his tour? It is to be doubted.
it Would have contributed to the solution of social problems in Latin America, if he would have canceled his tour? It would have been a character that makes jar commander-in-chief up? It is to be doubted. It just stayed thousands of disappointed tennis fans back. You should require that people from far away, no sports, should in these turbulent times and cultural events to visit? A Federer-exhibition match is not a welcome change?
In Colombia and Ecuador will continue to run the football championship, in Chile it is exposed to due to safety concerns. In Bogotà, the mass protests came just that day, to the peak when Federer had to occur. The game had to be cancelled because of the curfew of the government. A delicate Situation, the mastered Federer, well, he went on the Court and talking to the people. His Manager is now looking for a replacement date, otherwise the Tickets will be reimbursed.
So we're in the money: The allegation that someone who earns more than we do, to be greedy for money, is caught always. Welcome to this envy debate! Roger Federer is in accordance with "Forbes", with 86 million dollars in advertising revenue, the number 1 of all athletes. Speaks against him?
Federer reproach, his Foundation is just a vehicle to do buses, is cynical and pretentious. He founded it in 2003, with 22.
in any case, it proves its tremendous beam strength. These he should use, calls Mr Tobler, to take positions on current political topics. Federer is a global figure, would have to Express itself so to be consistent, to all of Latin America, the debate on climate change, human rights violations, Trump. He does not. He focused his Foundation on education for children in southern Africa. For this, he even speaks with President of the Republic. But that is too little trendy.
Federer reproach, his Foundation is just a vehicle to do buses, is cynical and pretentious. He founded it in 2003, with 22. It would only be a target, its Image a little Polish, he could simply transfer to money to non-profit organizations. However, he established a Foundation with his name, for which Act he is straight. Its education programs have reached over one Million children in southern Africa. You should be no matter whether this is viewed by some in the First world as a PR vehicle.
icebreaker – Hockey Podcast by Tamedia
The broadcast can be heard on Spotify as well as Apple. Or directly here:
Created: 29.11.2019, 17:19 PM