IT was it had to go, and as it always goes in football. Money solved the problem. Rosenborg had no time to wait.
Right or wrong, the problem had to be solved.
SO ENDED NORWAY's largest football club up paying around three million for a coach far down on the wish list, a coach the club's supporters in the brevs form have said they do not want. It is an expensive price.
But it is the price Rosenborg finally had to pay for a process which started with a parting without a plan for the future.
It is the price Rosenborg have to pay for poor craftsmanship.
ROSENBORG WERE SAFE on the suggestions that came from the club's lawyer in the Horneland-case, and there is little reason to doubt that what has been said on the road to the settlement has not been honestly intended.
Rosenborg was safe on the jussen.Ivar Koteng breaks all the unwritten rules
they felt They did nothing wrong.
Horneland-the problem was basically not their issue to solve.
Floka that arose in that moment, Eirik Horneland was interested in Rosenborg, and it came to pass that after he met the club in Trondheim 11. December, was in arbeidsrettslige contexts a relationship between the Horneland and FK Haugesund.
IN HAUGESUND SET FK Haugesund and was just as confident in their case. They had, of course, also legal assistance. In addition, told the chairman of the board Leiv Helge Kaldheim that Eirik Horneland well knew why, and under what circumstances the very special clause about a month's notice of termination came into the contract.
the Problem was that he could not talk about it.
Not even Rosenborg should have been told the reason for the startling clause of one month notice period.
FEELINGS AND mutual trust Haugesund talked about without talking about it helped, of course, not jussen on the road to mandagskveldens solution. It made us neither wiser. But such was FKHs case. Stuck in an emotional stomping the professional football does not take into consideration.
The movie is mostly about lokalpatriotisme, friendship and the understanding of what it means to be a small club in contention but a very much larger club.
FKHs chairman of the board Leiv Helge Kaldheim told me, among other things, that sportssjef Jostein Grindhaug before christmas was sent on a pyrotechnic course, so that he at christmas in be able to sell fireworks to the income for the club.
Everything to emphasize the point.
IN ADDITION ACTED it is also about the Bournemouth recent years has taken two FKH-spikes – Christian Gytkjær and Alexander Søderlund and sold them with good profit, as well as the fact that Leiv Helge Kaldheim thought the matter was over when he the 12. December, after it I understand with Eirik Hornelands blessing, sent Ivar Koteng a mail where he wrote that Horneland stayed in Haugesund.
20. December called Koteng back and did Kaldheim note that Rosenborg known to oppsigelsesklausulen no one would talk about.
3. christmas day came agent Jim Solbakken up to sort of reinforce the impression of Rosenborgs seriousness and intentions in the matter.
RBKs LAWYER SHALL on the basis of the clause and the case position have advised against Rosenborg to pay anything. He believed the club had such a good case that it would or would not stand in the Haugesund district court. But a club without a coach, a club that has tried everything and ended up far down on the list I hear Stig Inge Bjørnebye set in august, did not have time to wait on the legal system.- Kåre Ingebrigtsen say no to become the new Haugesund-trainer
Therefore paid Rosenborg.
Therefore had to Rosenborg to pay.
RIGHT WRONG when it comes to the letter of the law, Rosenborg has lost in this case. It went up for chairman Ivar Koteng before the weekend. It was, therefore, he last Friday, when the presentation of Eirik Horneland as a new and completely official RBK-coach had to be canceled, assumed the role of sacrificial lamb.
Just to hire Horneland is controversial in the RBK-circuits.
To lose reputation on the road, fair or not, does not make the situation better.
KOTENG SEE THAT Horneland case provides Rosenborg scratches in the paint and that the club's reputation, which for many reasons is not the best in the toppfotballfamilien, is further weakened. Sparkingen of Kåre Ingebrigtsen was clumsy craftsmanship. The lack of alternative arvtakere when Ingebrigtsen got expelled 19. July did not RBK board of directors ' handling of the case some services. And soon a half years later, after crystal-clear design specifications and rooted promises that Rosenborg play 4-3-3, hire a langball-avid 4-4-2 coach after a lot of noise, after first having received a no from Norway's maybe most committed 4-4-2 man, Geir Bakke.
When it comes on top of all the others who have said no are either the process or the promises to the believers.
After the hiring of Eirik Horneland by many is perceived as a major Rosenborgs overpass of even a small club, it creates feelings RBK can not defend themselves against.Rosenborg are stupid if they don't speak with Geir Bakke