"REVEALING: of the Judges to sign Vladimir Rodic"
"Vladimir Rodic, 25, received only a yellow card for his tirade against the assistant referee."
"Now want the Swedish football association domarchef Stefan Johannesson in bringing proceedings. Domarteamet sign Hammarbyspelaren to the disciplinary Board, Sportbladet reveal."
" Behavior is unacceptable. He can not be folded in retrospect, I think we should look over the rules, " says Johannesson."
"the Events after Hammarbys Nikola Djurdjic controlled the ball in the injury time goal against Kalmar FF at Tele2 Arena on Sunday has received a lot of attention."
"The assistant referee, Daniel Gustavsson, judging – correctly – delete the goal for offside."
"Then cast it into objects in the direction of Gustavsson and spectators took into innerplan."
"Rodic stirred in 20 metres"
"at the same time appeared målsituationen in the replay of Tele2's big screen and trissade up the coarse the mood further."
"Hammarbyavbytaren Vladimir Rodic was first, and screamed to the assistant judge, a short distance away. "
"Then continued Rodic to incite further, tightly next to the assistant referee 20 metres along the touchline, gesticulating and screaming."
"When judge Mohammed Al-Hakim discovered the situation, he shared out a warning to Rodic."
"Something that many in retrospect considered to be a too light punishment."
"– My mission in these situations is to look closely at what happened on the domarteamet not paid attention to it during the match, " says riksombudet Henrik Engvall to Sportbladet."
"Thus considers riksombudsmännen that they can't act."
"Want to try the acquis"
"With reference to the the rule recently managed Hedge get an incorrect warning and matchavstängning towards the star Paulinho traditionally."
"– this is something that I have discussed at length during the day with domarteamet from the match. I want us to try to get it tested."
"– It was such a stressful situation with everything that happened on the pitch and on the side of Tele2 to only to Mohammed Al-Hakim did an assessment so it does not need to have been accurate, " says Johannesson."
" I think very many would agree that Rodics behavior is not acceptable."
"– Because I have agreed with Al-Hakim that he should report the incident as well, " says Johannesson."
"”Can be a miscalculation”"
"Hammarby-Kalmar FF's chief referee confirms the task:"
" In my notification to the disciplinary Board, I will bring everything that created this situation: the goal was shown in replay, that it was thrown into the subject, that the spectators came in and Rodics action against my assistant."
"Was it wrong of you to just give him a warning?"
"– Neither I or the rest of the domarteamet can perceive everything in such a situation. When the TV has replays, different angles. I was too busy to take care of Nikola Djurdjic and 21 other players, my assistant took shelter from the to get things threw on. It was chaotic. Then it can be a miscalculation, " says Al-Hakim."
"– The threat, the environment affects us as people and can help to ensure that we only landed in a warning."
"Stefan Johannesson think that the case is important in principle."
" I don't know if it is possible fotbollsjuridiskt to change the warning in that direction, so that the punishment will be tightened. It is not so, I think that we should look over the rules."
"In retrospect, what had been the right punishment of Vladimir Rodic?"
" The disciplinary committee will determine now when we actually want to get it tested with a notification. You get a red card so it is automatically a match suspension but the board may also determine if multiple match ban, " says Johannesson."
"want to Otherwise Johannesson see how the rule below is designed."
"Tävlingsbestämmelserna, 7 chapter:
"with § 6 of the Examination of the judge's decision, the second paragraph"
"' If a split decision is manifestly erroneous, such as warning or expulsion clearly given to the wrong player, the disciplinary consequences of the decision, on the application of the relevant player or compound, are amended retrospectively, so far as concerns the förbundstävlingar, the disciplinary Board and, as far as relates to the distriktstävlingar, of the SDF board of directors, or of the SDF board appointed a special body. A test of a split decision is manifestly erroneous constitutes a tävlingsbestraffningsärende."
"the Application is in accordance with the above must have been next touched upon the decision-making body within five days from the match day in order to be able to be tested.”"