Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


Lengthy match when Bystedt was forced away from the AIK

It was the so-called ”golden share,” which became crucial.

with the help of its strong shareholding vote in favour of the motion that Richard Henze launched and given a hearing at the annual meeting in Fotbollsföreningen 5 march.

With the annual general meeting had Fotbollsförenings representative Joen Averstad the decision to AIK FF are going to vote for the board of directors of the company shall be composed of the same chairman, the members and any alternates AIK FF's board of directors, a so-called mirrored board.

and So it was.

But the decision to shut the minority shareholders out disliked by all.

get renewed confidence, " said Per Bystedt, which is a major shareholder and former chairman of the both the AIK football club and AIK Football AB

A representative for the Swedish shareholders, who recently bought shares in the team and said he visited the 2,000 general meetings, spoke of the decision is in breach of the Swedish corporate code and suggested that the board run over the shareholders.

"I am extremely disappointed in the new board's actions," added the man.

Robert Falck, who was elected chairman of the Fotbollsföreningen on 5 march, was, as expected, also the new president of the company.

which we believe to be morally right, and we will, of course, work for the company's best, explained Falck.

Under the hashtag ”inteallaminoritetsägare” went by several shareholders against the Gustaf Eriksson, who in Thursday's DN spoke that way to reflect the board ”is done in a hostile way” against the minority shareholders.

”As a shareholder in AIK fotboll AB, I believe I represented by the board of directors that was elected at AIK FF's annual meeting”, tweeted several shareholders on Thursday.

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.