Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Johan Croneman: Why was justice so incredibly important at 2019?

It is, of course, of course, with the rules in sport. It doesn't really matter how silly they are. We both like and accept many ancient and urlarviga rules. Therefore, as it has always been.

Who invented the slot, for example? The ball must be behind the head. Otherwise: Incorrect throw-in, the ball to the opponents. Seriously?!

Or penalty, from just 11 metres. Because someone has fallen inside the kritade area? Obstruction...? Has anyone been in the way without asking for permission?

just Say tennis: ”Advantage, mister Borg.”

a fully specified, objective, rule that sport must be fair? Or it must be fair? If a team has 80% possession and 34 trades on the goals against the opponents ' 2, and if they also have had three in the timber, been blown on a penalty and a goal after a dubious offside – and still lose with 0-1 – should there not be a higher authority that determines the justice of it all? Some such as watching tv and counting...?

It is downright cruel unfair. The best team will always win? Isn't it a rule – it should be a rule?

Someone who knows what fair is in sports and athletics?

You hear one expert after the other to tell if they are for or against WAS, the football newest rule – but I have never actually heard any really good explanation or analysis, whether for or against.

How has football for more than one hundred and twenty years passed without justice or ”justice”? Right okay, well?

through the years, judges who themselves are not seen and therefore not convicted, and the judges who perhaps simply seen the wrong. You remember a few matches you lost on a idiotdömd punishment – you remember often when one has received a punishment totally free, out of nothing, because out of a synsvag at linesman. Man has yet stood up and screamed straight out and never heard anyone complain about the three sweet points.

oh, Well, we have been told. It smoothes the out, in the long run. How nice is it cliché? Is there even any truth in it? We must begin to ask ourselves some questions, I think.

I is for WAS. I am for justice.

Define justice, thank you. Is not all of it?

some rules are as I said a little larviga, a part you do not understand even how they have come to. Since sport is deeply conservative is the new rules are rarely popular.

, fotbollsprofessor emeritus, tells us about how the rules were in the past. Often at least 200 men on the pitch (but always only eleven in the audience), it had no special clothes, you had to ask which teams they played in. Linjedomarna would be long and straight, and bollkallarna have also had hot Donald.

the 80,000 in the stands may glädjefnatt, the players, the leaders, the impossible has happened – in the 93 th minute.

Forget it. Wait a little bit. Do not take anything out in advance. Was sensible. The judge wants to watch tv first, talk with EACH room, there is namely, justice itself. Do you remember that the judges used to be called for rättsskipare – forget about it. Now they are some sort of assistants to the justice, who sits there in the culvert.

You may have to still ask: Why now? Why was justice so incredibly important at 2019? Some of you will remember when ”replay” came to tv sport, which is incredible progress, it was in the late 60's, and it blinked a R the upper right of the screen: Replay!

Satan what you thought it was amazing! And it was fifty years ago! Fifty-one years later realized that you could use the replay as a Rule. Fotollen really developed in the hysterical record time.

it is money. Always money. An input goal, or a bortdömt case, is worth – million. Maybe up to a billion. A thousand million!

When can I by the way think that it is possible to appeal against a decision? We have already seen some really questionable judgment, alternative angles have found a new alternative truths.

it Is perhaps a case for the Supreme court?

I remember when I went from the sports park (idrottsparken in Norrköping, that 7-year-old, hulkade, cried, clenched his fists: ”So inåthelvete darn unfair.”

It ought to be prohibited, to lose a skitlag. Life is never fair – but should in any case not the sport be in that?

With all the clear rules.

Poll: Should WAS inserted in the allsvenskan?

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.