Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Fuss after new penaltygeval Club Brugge: A videoref should not go to the time to look, do the rules apply
Jupiler Pro League Antwerp held Club Bruges to a doelpuntloze draw, but after four minutes it was the world looks completely different from the have looked. Jelle Van Damme pushed Lois Openda against the ground, but referee Lawrence Visser saw no team credentials and stay up. Also, the VAR did not. “This is a flawless penalty”, were the analysts unanimously after the match.

after only four minutes claimed the Club Brugge a penalty kick. A long ball on Lois Openda seemed too far, but because goalkeeper Sinan Bolat for a moment doubted, took Jelle Van Damme on the safe side and picking he the Bruges striker against the turf. Referee Fisherman saw there are no bones in it, also the videoref did not.

There is but one conclusion possible: penalty. That Openda not more on the ball can, in the end not to

Geert De Vlieger

In the studio Play Sports were the analysts unanimous: penalty kick. “That Openda not more on the ball can, in the end not to”, said Geert De Vlieger. “The only intention of mr. Van Damme is to Openda to keep away from the ball, and he does that on a wrong way. There is but one conclusion possible: penalty. You are sitting in that van to do anything, hey. Not just for the air conditioning to watch out for.” That phase very early on was, according to the former national goalkeeper. “Videoref should not go to the time to look. Only the rules apply.”

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.