" />
Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

England coach want the VAR to the collar

The video evidence remains in the mother country of the football to continue "VAR from perfect", as it is the default media.co.ke aptly put it. In the Prem

- 12 reads.

England coach want the VAR to the collar

The video evidence remains in the mother country of the football to continue "VAR from perfect", as it is the default media.co.ke aptly put it. In the Premier League a round, to the Decisions of the Video, Assistant Referee (VAR) the minds of managers, players, experts and Fans do not bring to a boil hardly.

The trouble with the question is to Decide tips to appreciate each other. The Clubs fight back against the video evidence in the way it is currently practiced in the Premier League. The "Telegraph" reported that the clubs are discussing about whether it managers should be allowed during a game against the referee's decision to appeal. The idea will be presented next week at a meeting of the 20 PL Clubs, the English newspaper in its report.

An Association responsible person told the Telegraph that he will plead that each team get in the future, up to three Objections because of the controversial scenes during a game. The League, however, already announced that they will oppose this measure to be decided. The Argument: The time-consuming and tactical objections would be used for the game wantonly to interrupt and stall for time.

Trouble for Pochettino and Klopp

The Anger is fueled by several incidents in recent weeks and months. After questionable decisions in the 2:1-worthy win of his Liverpool FC at Aston Villa scolded coach Jürgen Klopp, for example: "It is not correct that we have to sit here and laugh about it. Such situations can cost the Team Manager for the Job." The German alluded to a scene in the Firminos compensation because of a scarce and highly disputed offside position but was denied. Klopp was the scene countless times and no Offside discover considered.

The last of the upsets, the Tottenham suffered at the weekend against Everton (1:1). Heung Min Son looked after his Foul on André Gomes a Red card – but only after the VAR had intervened because of the Severity of the injury (complicated ankle fracture) was only under the impression of the TV images can be seen. "The VAR has to judge the Sons Tackling and not what happened after that," argued Spurs coach Mauricio Pochettino.

Clubs are calling for new guidelines

the Clubs, call the temporary end of the video proof in the Premier League, but it is not to threaten. According to "Telegraph" have proposed a VAR to suspend "until it could be perfected". But the majority of the respondents responsible to give the System a Chance for improvement before thinking about drastic steps. Mike Riley, General Manager of the Professional Game Match Officials Limited, had to adjust to a discussion of hardball and uncomfortable questions. Especially on the questions of why other leagues were better for the introduction of the VAR prepared, and whether the Premier League via the correct personnel have for it.

a Change in the guidelines is the Aim for sure. At the beginning of the season, the League and the clubs have agreed on the guidelines, that the Pitch-monitors should "sparingly" used. From "economical" but was not "even". In 110 Games the match officials decided to bring the pitch-side monitors, and decided on without you.

Also, the use of video displays in the stadium for the Fans should be addressed. The Premier League is organized on Thursday a Meeting in Manchester for the Trainer in the North of the island. Last week, met the Manager from the South at Stockley Park, where the VAR headquarters. Aston-Villa-Manager Dean Smith said afterwards: "You can do it now is not scrap, there are 28 countries that use it."

Created: 05.11.2019, 13:31 PM

Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.