Daniel Kindberg strikes back against the UG: Severe errors that need to be addressed

The economic crime, the accused former president in Östersund FK have chosen not to participate and defend itself in the Mission's audit program of the club, the broadcast during Wednesday evening in the SVT. But on Tuesday, he went out and responded to the accusations of financial doping in a press release.

– I have chosen not to comment on the Mission of the Review is tendentious reportage which this essentially was focused on damage to both the football club and me. However, I believe that some of the most severe errors need be reported, " says Kindberg and argue that the programme's thesis, that the club built their success on financial doping, and passed elitlicensen by dubious economic transactions, not true.

– the Build-up that led to our success was through our winning spelaraffärer and my private investment in the squad in the years 2013 to 2015, which was possible through our football philosophy. Total proceeds to the club about 30 million, partly through my investments in around 15 million in the player, partly by selling Modou Barrow for about 15 million that we have been developing, " says Kindberg.

THIS made a skenförsäljning of a restaurant in 2012 and had to up the value with more than two million. The sale of the barackliknande the restaurant Hörnsparken that is adjacent to the home stadium Jämtkraft Arena, has been noted by the authorized auditor in the annual report, but the restaurant continued to be taken up as the club's access.

Kindberg argues that the value of the restaurant has been written up, which he believes is evidenced by the public statements.

– in Addition, two independent raters reached a higher score than the 3.1 million that the restaurant been up to in the accounts, " he says without going into why it in the financial statements from 2012 looks like the restaurant has been sold.

According to the Östersunds FK have been due to the fact that the club at the last moment repented and kept the restaurant, which, however, thus is not shown on the year-end report.

Kindberg also refers to another auditor than the audited financial statements and claim to have seen a sheet for sale.

Mission review claim a sponsorship agreement with the construction group, Peab, which should have been made possible by Kindberg sat as the ceo of the municipal housing company Östersundshem and allowed the purchase of land by the Peab to an excessive price, which the money did in in THIS.

”This falls on its own absurdity because at the time when the agreement was proposed, 2013, was Daniel Kindberg still employed at Peab as PRESIDENT of Fältjägaren Fastigheter (Town North). The so-called markaffären is initially implemented more than a year later, in July of 2014 when Daniel Kindberg appointment as ceo of Östersundshem,” it says in the press release.

of the 127 million, but the Mission review presents in the program a document that shows that Kindberg in a so-called indicative bids valued the to 82 million, roughly the sum of the Östersunds-Posten, on examination, come to the conclusion that the land was worth.

Kindberg claims that the deal covered more ground than he valued in the document and believe that the UG ”compare apples and pears”.

Even the claims that Östersund FK should have been added to the large funds through false invoices between Östersundshem, Peab and a business in Sollefteå, which is powered by a childhood friend to Kindberg dismissed. Kindberg, which is one of the defendants at the trial of the case starting on 24 april, contests brottsmisstankarna and refers to a submission to the district court to show that the works Sollefteåföretagen invoiced for really was.

has taken part of the Kindbergs criticism. Samir Bezzazi, the reporter in the programme, points out that during the several months tried to get Kindberg to respond to such information prior to publication.

" If it would be gross factual errors, one wonders why he did not let us interview him. That he now chooses to comment on is remarkable, especially as the criticism is actually not true. In some cases it is based on a misunderstanding of what we actually say in the programme, and in other cases, he says, the direct errors, " says Bezzazi and emphasises that Mandate review to feel secure with the information you have.

Read more: Business as saviors of The season – sold the restaurant but kept it as an asset