Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


When His fight to make abortion of two in stead of one fetus

This says that they are formed it as a victory if they can have a decree against "tvillingabort". Seldom has such a misvisande nyord at the same time been so treffande since the result of forbodet probably will lead to the abortion of more tvillingar.

This means, of course, to prohibit the fosterreduksjon by tvillingsvangerskap so that one can reduce from two to one fetus. They tydelegvis not have been joined, is that for the women or families that debt as an option to often be to have an abortion on both the fetus instead of only one fetus.

Solberg has turned in the view of the tvillingabort

Regjeringsforhandlingane is started, and Solberg uses the female body as the battleground and forhandlingslokkemiddel the face of Progress contrasted against the landsmøtevedtaket to the Right that says that abortlova shall not be changed. It has come ulne messages that this shall not make access to abortion worse, but it is tåkeprat since His of course not is looking for a liberalisation.

After haustens big debate about §2.3 c so it is clear that there is no particular support in the population to innskjerpe access to abortion by illness and deviance among the fetus or to a innskjerping at all. No hintar Sector that they can be satisfied with a decision related to fosterreduksjon.

Fosterreduksjon have been performed a long time in Norway to reduce the fleirlingesvangerskap from, for example, four to three or two, because it is risky for both the woman and fostera when the number of fetuses auker. In addition, a performed fosterreduksjon pursuant to section 2.3 c when one fetus has been appealed. To information be also tvillingsvangerskap as risikosvangerskap.

Right-women slaughtered Ernas abortforslag – but it was five years ago

In 2016, it was made a legal assessment of the ministry of Health that found that fosterreduksjon also covered by abortlova and that the same criteria is the basis for the granting of the fosterreduksjon that by fully svangerskapsavbrot. It is among the things that fosterreduksjon before the end of the twelfth svangerskapsveke is sjølvbestemt.

the Opponent against fosterreduksjon by tvillingar seem not to comprehend that for any then there is a great distinction to should accept or go pregnant with two children instead of one. It may be that one extra child that capsized the wagon in their life. We have met many women and couples in connection with pregnancy and abortion, know that this is real issues.

the Reasons that a man looks for to be able to bring two children are close mangslungne that the reasons that a look for themselves to be able to have children at all. For they shall and the option to fosterreduksjon to cancel all pregnancy in place. When is the risk for miscarriage of approximately 5-10% for the remaining fetus is a risk they are willing to take, and a risk they of course host informed.

Erna speaks out on abortbråket: - I know that it is a difficult subject

however, It is wrong to misrepresent it as a frequent problem. Center for fostermedisin in Trondheim performing these fosterreduksjonane state that there were five fosterreduksjonar on tvillingar in 2017 and seven by the end of October in 2018.

Erna Solberg has in nyttårstalen its said that she wish that Norwegian women should give birth to more children. Well, after the last hestehandelen, she has a long way to go to build the confidence that she has women's rights, lives and health in mind. In Beijingplattformen to the united nations that Norway has stopped to then it says that it is a basic human right to be able to determine the distance between, and how many children one should have, even.

Prohibitions against abortion has never led to that the women have born several children. In place, should one trust that women know their own best, and facilitate that women can give birth to the children they will have and not force them to go in the board, or indirectly force them to have an abortion on more than they even want.

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.