In the beginning of February, the Liberal party leader Jan Björklund that he will leave his mission. The news came just a few weeks after L have entered into the 73-punktsöverenskommelsen with the government and the Party, and thus, in practice, the split of the Alliance on the national level.
since Then, the two main candidates participated emerged as the successor of the leadership: ms Nyamko Sabuni and Erik Ullenhag. Now announcing ms Nyamko Sabuni, she stands as a candidate to take over after Jan Björklund.
" I feel I have enough support and has been received very well. But now we have a process, and it is the delegates that determine who they then want to see the party. Right now I'm one of them you want to hear, then select it. It is an open field, " says Nyamko Sabuni.
– the Result is very good policy in each individual case. But I had hoped that the four parties had been able to communicate more of the vision for the policy. It has not done, and I think that is a miss. For every budget, which is added, I hope now to describe the vision and what you want to accomplish for our country. The most important thing must be to carry out good policies that create better opportunities and conditions for our people. It is how we become attractive to the electorate, it is so L can grow. Just saying that we should isolate the SD and then not have a vision for what they want with the policy will not help.Nyamko Sabuni holds press conference. Photo: Magnus Hallgren
" No, I think not. Sometimes I get the feeling that both the L C opened their boxes and said: if you, Stefan Löfven, to be prime minister so you may implement it here. I had wished that they had sat down and discussed about what they want for the future. What policy is the best. Now we get a mishmash of liberal politics, right-wing politics and left-wing politics without any coherent agenda. It is a pity. But there is a chance to get it now the budget for the budget for the remainder of the term.
" I am prepared to share the criticism. This is not to say that politics is bad, but we need to communicate the vision of what it is we want with our country. The second resolves itself.
" I mean that the work of the parliamentary committees have continued to function in a democratic way, regardless of which party is elected into the parliament. Then I experienced that a lot of people did a thing by freezing out SD. But today I feel that it works as it should.
" Why, that sometimes also the forces of evil to put their vote on good ideas. We can use the cast to achieve something that is better for our country we should not deny citizens the.
the Liberals should go forward as a private party with its own policies, but I also think that L should communicate that we are a non-socialist party in the middle. We have never had a problem with working with the social democrats, we have carried out many good reforms through the ages. We have also carried out many useful reforms with the Alliance.
" We shall go to the choice on that we are a non-socialist party with hemhörighet in the Alliance. We get the majority, so it is great. We are not in the majority so we need to get back to how the country should be governed. I want to avoid that we say that the Alliance is dead forever and thus only remains to be to some extent due to the social democrats. I am not prepared to sign on.
" because I cherish my party. Therefore, Sweden needs a party without vested interests - with bildningsgrund to stand on, from preschool to higher education to research and innovation. We need to discuss climate and environmental policy, the economy - we have the largest gaps in the OECD countries. Everyone is talking about it, but I see no policies to solve the mathematics. We also need to discuss migration and integration. There are many important issues which Liberals today do not give answers to and which I wish I would get to be with in the law to develop policy and communicate it to voters.