Siri Martinsen, leader of NOAH, responds to my post about the trenches in rovdyrdebatten. There, I examine how the Norwegian rovdyrpolitikk has been in the last few years and that it came from reactions from both sides after the government's decision before christmas, as The celebration for the wolf 12. January.Ulvekjeftens political power Comment
It Martinsen does not mention is that I am in the post place myself and Left side of the page that will increase rovdyrbestandene and the preservation of wolves in Norwegian nature. On nature's page.
Fresh figures from the miljødirektoratet shows that the grazers are taken by predators was a record low in 2018. The development has gone in the right direction over several years. Measures against sauetap and dialogue with beitenæringen has worked. Nevertheless, Slagsvold Vedum on NRK Debate and says that wolf is a threat to people and animals on the village. Wolves have not been a threat for people since our king was Danish, but Vedum does not and will destroy the wolf completely. He claims that he speaks for "the people of the village", without mentioning that the people of the village want it to be wolf.
In my post, I am trying to establish some common truths in the rovdyrdebatten so that we can get ahead. It is five times more wolves in Norway than before, and fewer sheep being taken by wolves. It is the facts. This is also something that the major parties in Parliament have to accept, that the goal must be fewer sauetap to the wolf, don't shoot as many people as possible wolf. And it supports most people.
It must be Right and the Labour party eventually realize, as the two largest parties, and thus ruling in which the high bestandsmålene of the predator should be. Terje Aasland told even in Bård Hoksrud to "tighten up" Ola Elvestuen, because the Ap will shoot more wolves than the government. With such measures we will never going further.the Wolf stands strong in the Norwegian people Leader