for The past two decades it has developed strong authoritarian traits in the Norwegian public administration which, amongst others, have been stimulated by and stimulated the so-called "New Public Management", a management philosophy that is based on mistrust and measurement – where beslutningsrett and lønnsklasser moves upwards while talking about decentralization. "Nærpolitireformen" is typical for this language.the VERDICT FELL on MONDAY: Mirian Yanira Befring was a jury member in Eirik Jensen case. Here she tells about how the past months have been. Reporter: Angelica Garden. Video: Nicolai Delebekk Show more
In the police was Eirik Jensen, in all its uryddighet, a representative of opposition to this authoritarian philosophy. There is hard battles here – any debate around Søgnen and the Oslo school, and the all around health enterprises, bears witness.
This authoritarian trait is manifested not only within the bureaucracy, but also in relation to the population. Typically enough, when it has become more important with common correction in jurysystemet, close to a half again this safety valve. Distrust again.
In the last case for legmannsjuryen reviewed the lawyers legfolkets disputed this claim. They did it on a part of the judgment where they obviously had a more scientific attitude to the evidence than it fagdommerne could have. It was simply embarrassing, to follow much of the aktoratets ‘proof’.Cappelen squinted morskt against the judge Comment
How could someone in halvsøvne add emphasis on the fact that Jensen reveals anything, when he tells us that there are few people on the job – when this happens right during the prime holiday season? The glittering clear from such interpretations, is that the police have been so heavily ‘biased’ that it is difficult to believe in any of bevisføringen. The looking, can always put together a story. It is difficult to explain the behavior from something other than the fact that it has gone prestige in the matter.
Bureaucracy and the judiciary have begun to behave more and more retthaversk : In the Orderud case someone had to be convicted, even if you did not know who had committed the murder. In the Baneheia case one had to judge a person as technology indicated that was not on-site. In the tragic Valdres-case had the government failed, but the mother was sentenced.
Wessels 1700-century poem about the blacksmith and the baker renner in the hu. Rettsfølelsen needed some judged the Blacksmith was the murderer, but was too useful, so an excess baker was sentenced.
What makes the fourth estate? It sits in quiet in the boat, not affect. It is striking how uncritically the press has been. It also seems to have been taken by the nyautoritære wave.LEFT RIGHT: Just after it became clear that the fagdommerne to set aside the jury's acquittal of Eirik Jensen, left the court together with his partner Ragna Lise Vikre. Video: Nicolai Delebekk Show more
Now, was Jensen guilty or not? It is impossible to say. Police have made an embarrassing weak job, despite all the details. Completely obvious is the fact that Jensen has broken many jobbforskrifter, that it is a case of friendly-corruption – which is the most common korrupsjonsformen in Norway – and that he probably has known about some of the hasjtransportene. It has been a part of informantarbeidet, but naked, profit-oriented business activity can I not see traces of. But this is a minor detail.
The most frightening of the matter is that the relax bevisføringen is believed by fagdommere. It raises a serious rettssikkerhetsspørsmål, especially when the media is so uncritical – since they wait until the bell is gone.Jensen's opportunities Comment