Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


The conservatives are targeting a no-confidence vote against Strandhäll (S)

Under prime minister Stefan Löfvens question and answer session in the parliament on Thursday announced Moderatledaren Ulf Kristersson that the party will formally arouse the mistrust of the Annika Strandhäll (S). The background is the criticism against the provision of the Agency's previous director-general Ann-Marie Begler. The conservatives believe that they have not been able to get an acceptable answer as to why Begler was kicked.

" Our patience is running out. Our confidence is depleted. We urge the parliament to explain to Annika Strandhäll not have the confidence of parliament, " says Ulf Kristersson (M).

Ebba Busch Thor said that the party will support the Conservatives censure against social security.

”the Data on how the Annika Strandhäll have handled the governance of the social Insurance agency has not met satisfactory by the government. The trust is depleted. The christian democrats will support the Conservatives in a vote of censure.”, writes Busch Thor on Twitter.

there is an ongoing review in the committee on the constitution on how it was when Ann-Marie Begler became of the mission. His Ekström (S), KU's vice-president, call Conservatives vote of no confidence against the social security Annika Strandhäll (S) for ”desperate”.

”KU:s report is presented on less than a month. It is desperate not to wait for it. It would seem that Ulf Kristersson uses the censure of valtaktiska reasons,” writes Ekström in a comment to the TT.

The sweden democrats say they are likely to support misstroendeförklaringen.

– If not Strandhäll manages to deliver a very clarification version now which puts the matter in a different light, so I find it hard to see that we will land in any other conclusion than that we support the misstroendeförklaringen, " says Mattias Karlsson (SD) to the TT.

Jonas Sjöstedt says he does not think that there is a basis for directing suspicion towards Strandhäll.

" We see the dismissal of the Begler, politically, in the way the government had treated the ill, and then let Begler go as the scapegoat. It was clear already then. There is a review in the KU and there would be things there that change the picture so it would be able to be changed, but now we see not that it is because of the mistrust, " says Jonas Sjöstedt (V).

the Centre says the TT that they will discuss the issue of distrust in his alliance. The liberals are awaiting also with a vengeance, they say for the TT.

president Andreas Norlén has announces that the vote on the misstroendeförklaringen against Strandhäll will be held Tuesday, may 28, at 12.

– It is required that at least one-tenth of the members of the Swedish parliament stands behind the question arises, then, at least 35 as it was in this case. It is submitted in the day had 42 members signed on, " says Johan Welander, kammarsekreterare at the offices of the parliament.

it is required that more than half of the members of the Swedish parliament supports the misstroendevoteringen.

– you Get a 175 that supports the claim then you win acclaim, " says Johan Welander.

M and KD gathers together 92 of the mandate, together with the SD there will be 154 seats.

in a series of articles during the last spring been able to reveal several of the circumstances surrounding the petningen of the Begler. Among other things, how the Annika Strandhäll (S) offered Ann-Marie Begler a top job as director-general of the Authority shortly before she was kicked.

Begler told in a first interview with DN after the announcement, that she herself was surprised by the decision and that she had to quit because the government was afraid to lose the election because of the debate surrounding the social Insurance agency. Annika Strandhäll (S), on his side, said that the comments on the Agency's governance has been raised several times.

Read more: Hearing before KU about how Begler was kicked

Read more: Ann-Marie Begler, in her first interview after she sparkats from the social Insurance

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.