The Federal constitutional court has rejected complaints of the AfD group in the Bundestag against the refugee policy of the Federal government as inadmissible. The group had not demonstrated sufficiently that it had been violated by the decisions on the admission of refugees, their Rights, it said in a in Karlsruhe published decision (Az. 2 BvE 1/18). The AfD had in particular complained that refugees had not been dismissed in 2015.
The in a so-called organstreit proceedings provided AfD applications will not be allowed to be decided by the judges. They aimed to commit the Federal government of an action, and "true objective law". This was according to the settled case-law in this proceeding is inadmissible. Organstreit proceedings aimed at the clarification of jurisdiction and not served "the control of the objective constitutionality of a particular organ in action".More about
contempt for women, homophobia, anti-Semitism, Why right-wing populists discriminated groups embraceMalte Lehming
The AfD group represented in their complaints, among other things, the Position that the government had violated by their decision to acquiesce in the entry of refugees in certain cases, the participation rights of the Bundestag. Also, you want to make it possible to determine that asylum seekers, under certain conditions, were rejected at the German border. Thus, the requests fulfilled the requirements of a organstreit proceedings, it was said in the decision. (AFP)daily mirror tomorrow location for your Free copy