The goal of the coalition partners agree. Both want to relieve operating pensioners in the health insurance contributions as soon as possible the annoying double verb eitragung on income from private pensions to get rid of. But now they argue the funding of this project. And the constellation is a peculiar: While the CDU-politician and Minister of health, Jens Spahn ask the taxpayers to pay for it would warn the social Democrats against tax increases and the threat of the Black Zero. They insist that the money necessary social security contributions from cut off.
On Tuesday Spahn brought the project to the way. In his draft bill, the daily mirror, he calculates the cost of three billion euros in the year. 500 million could be raised by the contributors, he suggests. The hefty remainder of the 2.5 billion should come from the tax pot by means of an increase in the Federal subsidy for non-insurance cash benefits from 14.5 to 17 billion euros.
Finance Minister Olaf Scholz (SPD) rejects the. Spahns funding proposal was "not convincing", he had a spokesman tell. The project is not deposited in the coalition agreement "as a priority". Therefore, no additional funds were in the Federal budget. And, a small Wink with the fence post: The financial position of the health insurance companies look "significantly better“.
"the tax increases we need for this long-overdue Reform is not"
in fact, the statutory health insurance funds currently have € 21 billion on the high edge. This is also why health expert Karl Lauterbach for the SPD, the thing clear to you. "Operation pensioners can be relieved from the Surplus of the insurance companies", he tweeted after becoming aware of the Spahn's assault. "Tax increases, we don't need for this overdue Reform." The social-democratic coloured grounds Lauterbach provided later: If you Finance the project from contributions, would have to pay the employers half of the cost. In the case of financing, taxes which was not the case.daily mirror tomorrow location for Free order
White, The Minister of Finance have to contribute "a substantial amount", is of the essence, however, the CDU-pension expert Peter. The promotion of occupational pensions was "first and foremost, his job". And Spahn calculates that the revenue loss to the Treasury is equivalent to the pensioner's discharge Of 0.2 contribution rate points. This makes it clear that a "fair division of such burdens".
Spahn sees in the relief task for the whole society
to get The main argument for his request, the project for the most part, tax financed, but in its design. The withdrawal of the double verb eitragung serve "the overall social mission is to promote occupational pension schemes and to combat old-age poverty in Germany", - stated in it. And that the statutory health insurance bar already with a loss of Revenue of around 1.3 billion euros in the form of remuneration conversion for occupational pensions, "a significant financial contribution to the promotion of occupational pension schemes".
The left party expressed concern over the dispute. The case should not be rubbed after a successful year - long battle "between health and the Ministry of Finance," said retirement expert Matthias W. Birkwald. Spahn and Scholz would end "the largest pension theft in the history of the Federal Republic of immediately." The double verb eitragung had been "a mistake“, said the FDP's pension expert John bird.
No retroactive compensation
According to the Spahns plans to be the double verb eitragung, which was introduced 15 years ago under the SPD health Minister Ulla Schmidt with the active help of the CSU-politician, Horst Seehofer, of the year from the table. A retroactive compensation for the victims of this Coup, however, is not provided. The group predicts Birkwald, in the case of many Insured persons with Altverträgen, the got buzzing since 2004, the full contribution rate, "a big disappointment".