Two young men, who belonged to their gang, was murdered on the evening of the 3rd July in Vivalla, Örebro, sweden. A many years ago, of the police known gängkonflikt low according to prosecutor Krister Petersson behind the murder, which was brutal. A automatic weapons, a gun, a motorcycle helmet and a pair of scissors used as a weapon.
came to be prosecuted for involvement in the killings. Of the four who were charged for dödsmisshandeln are judged now two for murder, one for extremely aggravated assault and a very serious assault, and serious involuntary manslaughter.
The person who was charged with the actual killing, a 21-year-old, freed, however, from the mordåtalet. Örebro district court does not consider that the prosecutor has met the standard of proof against the person.
who was sentenced to 15 years and 10 months in prison, returned to Sweden in 2013 after returning from the IS-controlled area. Exactly what he did there is not understood, but he was one of the first people from Örebro who was radicalised and travelled down to Syria to join IS. The man convicted now of murder, abuse in a court of law and crimes against vapenlagen.
According to witnesses, 30-year-old repeatedly said, ”kill him, kill him” before he himself began to chop against the already skottskadade the victim with a pair of scissors.
the Assault, in a court of law consists in that the man threatened witnesses by making it clear to them that if they kept quiet about what they had seen, they would die. The witnesses became upset, not only by what they had seen, but also of mortal danger. They were forced to move and has since lived at a secret place.
which is now found guilty of the murder, is also in his mid-30s. He is sentenced to imprisonment of 13 years and ten months. A third, a 23-year-old, convicted for extremely aggravated assault to imprisonment for 5 years and 10 months. A then 15-year-old boy is sentenced, he for extremely aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter to the closed youth care for 11 months. A 30-year-old convicted of attempted aggravated assault to imprisonment for three months and a 20-year-old is sentenced to care for the ill-treatment, the protection of criminal and minor offences.
the Reason that the defendants come to be sentenced for various crimes associated with what intent they had. The two under the right, demonstrably, had the intent to kill and sentenced for murder. When it comes to the other two has not the prosecution been able to show that they intended to kill.
com two people to the Vivalla on a stolen moped. It is not clear exactly why they came, but once on site, to meet a third person, and gunfire erupted. Who exactly started the shooting is also unclear. The person who was already in Vivalla was armed with an automatic weapons with which he fired at least 14 shots when he was confronted by the two men on a moped. They fired in the turn five shots with a pistol.
on the moped skottskadades. The one in the chest and the other in the leg. One fell in the hop on the spot, the other took in spite of their damage up the search for the intended victim who escaped.
The intended victim was overtaken 200 metres further away. Where he was shot another three shots. The man died of the injuries.
The man who collapsed at the moped was soon after viciously assaulted. He was shot, he stampades on the head, was beaten with a motorcycle helmet and had at least five stab wounds to the head and torso.
that happened was filmed by the people who were on the spot. The films have been the key evidence. Two of those sentenced, however, have denied the crime, but the court deems them did confound. The district court also has come to the conclusion that they are now doomed collusion – which means that they can be held liable for the victim came to die.
One of the motives for the murder could be a murder that occurred on 5 July 2015 in Vivalla. The assassination led to it, a conflict arose between two different groups of people.
Prosecutor Krister Petersson believes that the decision is surprising:
– Tingrätten has made it easy for themselves. I maintain that all, except possibly a 15-year-old should be sentenced for murder.
the Prosecutor will appeal the decision.