It should have been a riksnyhet: A teacher lifted out a rowdy student out of the classroom. She has not done anything wrong, " noted the police after the parents of the child notified her. The same said the schools Inspectorate.
But the Child and school student representative, BEO, felt that she acted ”offensive” and imposed on their own damages of 15 000 sek to the student. And the school paid. In addition, the pressure the teacher to resign, which she finally did. Wrote about this in Sydsvenskan a couple of weeks ago (20/1).
awful for the teacher, it is also a clear illustration of one of the Swedish school's greatest problems. For sure, parents have responsibility for bringing up their children. But not all parents will take the responsibility. And children forget easily. Their brains are not fully developed, and, in some cases, either there is or should be a diagnosis.
In the end, the onus is therefore on the school to deal with the rowdy students, the roudy students, the ones that plague everyone's existence. Purely as a matter of fact, it is the way it is.
so will all the suffering: They themselves, as well as the other. The cliché is true which says that a chain is never stronger than its weakest link. And a school that is not capable of keeping order, will never be able to become a good school. This applies both to schools in disadvantaged areas, in the inner city and in residential areas.
Already in the fifth class begins some schools to droop precariously as regards the pupils ' sense of security and the opportunity to work in peace, it can be seen in the municipalities elevenkäter. In the eighth grade, the differences are often even more clearly the schools in between. It can also be seen in the grades – and no wonder.
The real perspective would be to stand up for all students, also the rowdy, and their right to a safe school with good working environment.
to do its job about it all the time, there was a colleague who tjattrade and interfered with, that perhaps even was intimidating or violent? Nor children can work under the circumstances. They waste their days in vain trying to concentrate.
Some of them come from the resourceful home which takes over where the school's shortcomings. Parents can help to teach, or so they can afford to pay someone who can. But the other then? It is to them the great betrayal perpetrated, day by day, in Swedish schools.
not to be addressed, it does not matter how much resources the politicians are shooting at, or how nice the teachers have prepared lessons. The children will still not be able to absorb them.
And the saddest thing of all is that the children's own representatives, the authority BEO, to a large extent, thus contributing to this. BEO has long been a routine to assert that all physical discipline against students is ”abusive” and thus wrong, and then award damages.
right after this. Of course, it is insulting for a student to be reprimanded. It is located in the tillrättavisningens nature, even if it is not its main purpose. It is embarrassing to be put in place when skrävlat and wide. However, this is not harmful in itself.
on the Contrary, it is included in the good and loving upbringing that the adults set clear boundaries and is also clear when these frames are being violated. How can this obvious truth have become so forgotten?
were to stand up for all students, also the rowdy, and their right to a safe school with good working environment. For so is it with children that they cannot do this themselves without the need to get help with it.
the Teachers must, therefore, have the tool already during their training for how they should handle themselves, the students and the conflicts that will inevitably arise, if not sooner then later. Extra support must be given to pupils who need it. Society must be clear what powers teachers have, and the schools need to back them when they step in.
whose parents in misguided love for their children is directed against the school, switch to another. But it may be happened. This is basically a question of fairness.