the Social democratic movement, there is a before and after sænkelsen of the corporation in 2013, which ended up to share the top of the old labour party and paving the way for new alliances.
In a new in spite of Mette Frederiksen (S), published by Gyldendal, elaborates partiformanden, that the subject was to bring her closer to the Henrik Sass Larsen. He belonged to the otherwise right-wing of the party, while she belonged to the left wing.
But they came together in disagreement about selskabsskattelettelser, which they defended at the time.
- For historiefortællingens fault occurred important shifts in the Social democratic party. The course on corporate income tax was an event which came to play a larger role than you think, says Mette Frederiksen in the book, which is published on Wednesday.
For many social democrats were sænkelsen of the corporate tax from 25 to 22 percent, who got the cup to overflow.
the Day before Mette Frederiksen in 2013 as employment had to present its proposal for a kontanthjælpsreform, the plans were on the tax credit leaked to the press.
It was by observers and commentators regarded as deliberate harassment, and the picture that stood back was that the unemployed had to pay for tax breaks for business owners.
the Then Danish prime minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt and the Danish minister of finance Bjarne Corydon was an advocate for sænkelsen, which therefore created a fertile ground for the alliances, who is in the top of the party today.
the Plan was me and Henrik to block the eyes up, and we had a falling out with Bjarne. It was crucial, then parted our ways politically. The disagreement was too big. It was clear that Bjarne did not understand us, says Mette Frederiksen in the book.
She believes that the division between the right and left of the Party changed, like the fractions, which could be traced back to formandsopgøret in 1992, changed.
Suddenly, there was Carsten Hansen, Nick Hækkerup, Henrik Sass Larsen and I agreed, even though we had up until then been the representatives of the different wings. We got together, for we believed all that the Holocaust was wrong politically, says Mette Frederiksen.
In the book she says further that she regret the amount of the reforms, she stood behind as employment. In addition, she talks against the uddannelsesloftet, the showdown with the teachers in the SRSF-government and its vision on public services.
Most of all, regret that she have to be a vocal advocate for a more lenient immigration policy.
In connection with its in spite of 2017 featured Thorning, however, that Mette Frederiksen, was agreed to in reformlinjen.
Only a lowering of the corporate tax rate led to internal disagreement in the party, said Thorning.
- I don't think we were entirely in agreement on the corporation. But on the major lines, I would argue that we had agreed on the direction we were going in.
- There is no one today who suggest that we should raise the corporate tax rate, it suggests enough that it was a fine enough resolution, said the social democrats to the news agency Ritzau.