Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook


Høyresidens tampering with abortloven has one upside

Attempt to prohibit abortion will lead to more abortions, more difficult abortions, and more dangerous abortions.

the Labour party's proposal to offer early ultrasound to all and allow more people to get access to the NIPT test, a safe blood test that accurately reveals any diseases by foster, will lead to multiple fetuses can get help and life-sustaining treatment already in mom's belly, and fewer with severe sick foster will have to experience the traumatic senaborter halvgått in pregnancy.

Each year around a thousand women in Norway tvillingmamma. Two years after that Bent High, clarified that he felt that the law on abortion on demand must also apply when a woman carries more than one fetus in the stomach, we know that the demand for such interventions is vanishing low.

In 2018, it was eight women who had performed an abortion on one of the two fetus. Fostermedisiner Kjell Åsmund Salvesen Blix, one of the two doctors who can perform the procedure in the Uk, warned on NRK 3.January that these women probably would have taken away both fetuses without this option. The eight women had, like other women, their reasons for that choice they took. But it must be their case. So it was a privatsak it for the 12 733 others who took abortion in 2017. It is called self-determined because one can just decide.

Every child is a gift , and we will therefore be happy that the Progress and the centre party has not been given the green light for the proposal, they promoted just before christmas on the prohibition of the forsterreduksjon. Something they got support from both the prime minister and the minister of health. Had this proposal become a reality, we would perhaps have had eight children, less to rejoice about. When the Progress says it will be a "historic win" with a ban against abortion on demand for women carrying more than one fetus, we must ask if they at all care about the warnings from the academic community that it in reality will lead to more abortions.

health minister Bent on High has been crystal clear that a prohibition against forsterreduksjon "in reality means a tightening of Norwegian women's right to abortion on demand. And that women who are pregnant with multiple fetuses should only be able to choose to carry forward all of the embryo – or none of them ." (Aftenposten, 26.October 2016). A principled and wise conclusion that High now looks away from to please conservative forces in the Sector.

A different myth which is broken is that there is a discriminatory "Downsparagraf". The expression Erna Solberg introduced seemed so hurtful on many with Downs syndrome and their families that it has been apologized for and withdrawn.We have in the debate also got to know that it is not true, as Ropstad claim, that more than before the opt-out fetus with Down syndrome. The figures have remained quite stable on babies born with Downs.

It is established that the abortlovens section 2c has a neutral wording that does not mention a single diagnosis. On the contrary, expresses paragrafens lovarbeid both objective and fair criteria that ensures women equal treatment. Lawyers and nemdsleger have explained that to remove the objective in the law will lead to a skjønnsbasert assessment of the woman's situation. So the discrimination the right falsely allege happens with the current scheme, will in fact be inflicted on women. Those with Ernas abortlov to be at the mercy of the local nemnder. Strangers in the abortnemdene to determine whether "Anne" or "Trine" is resourceful enough to carry out a sick fetus that they decide on is "viable" enough.

In addition, we know that the various nemdene considering Anne and Sally a little differently depending on where in the country they happen to had to live. But Anne and Sally do not set the same. Anne lives in central and has a good economy. She seeks out a private gynecologist and get an early ultrasound, where there is suspected disease. Anne go to Denmark to take a NIPT-blood test. When it confirms a serious deviation drag Anne to Sweden to have an abortion because she can't bear the thought of having to explain herself to strangers in a abortnemd.

Trine, it is not quite as easy, she lives in a small village and there are not any offers for the ultrasound before it is routinely offered to all women in week 18. When it is detected, the suspicion of serious disease, she gets offers of amniocentesis. She is afraid of the sting in my stomach and know it can lead to miscarriage, but the gentle and accurate NIPT test she wants, she can just forget, for she is not above 38 years. Furthermore, the Bent High, said that it creates a "sorteringsamfunn" if too many people like her get access to the all the best fosterdiagnostikken. And even if the current KUB-test (combined ultrasound and blood test) is supposed to find exactly the same diagnosis as the NIPT test, so lead the safe test for the "hunting on the Downs syndrome". Believe it or not, the minister of health have got to say it, several times.

For the Labour party, with neither Amy or Carol, or some other pregnant women to experience this. They should get the same offer no matter where they live in the Uk and regardless of the economy. No one should stand with his hat in his hand at abortnemndene to unfold in their life. Many say that they experience abortnemdene as a tilleggsbelastning in an already bad situation. The Ap will therefore look at the organization of the abortnemndene regardless of the ongoing abortstriden.

On the left could we might have rejoiced over the complete chaos abortsaken has led to the bourgeois side. But the lack of respect for women and willingness to hestehandle about important rights that Sector, and parts of the Right with the prime minister in front exercise, is just sad.

Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.