Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

How can Jensen be saved

John Christian the Fire began Wednesday forsvarernes procedure to get acquitted Eirik Jensen. Spesialenheten had then spent a day and a half to describe a corrupt police officer who had contributed to the importation of huge quantities of drugs. The defenders could have started to draw a picture of a man who since 1981 has devoted his life to fighting criminals, with danger for own life. They did not.

the Policeman who has Jensen's old job is of a completely different school than its predecessor Comment

the Strategy, the defenders have put up is probably far more effective. Jensen's defense began the procedure to focus on two things: am dry as tinder law and Gjermund cappelen in his lack of credibility.

Guro Glærum Kleppe and Jan Egil Presthus had performed what must be called a strong and convincing review of his arguments. Spesialenhetens procedure was a clear history of a criminal cooperation that has evolved since Jensen and Cappelen met for the first time in 1993. They went to the hard attack on ekspolitimannens credibility and spent a lot of time to display the contexts: communication between the two accused put up against the times of introductions and Jensen's personal finances.

PROCEDURES: Dagbladet commentator summarizes aktoratets procedure in the case against Eric Jensen. Prosecutors go hard out against Jensen's credibility so far in the procedures. Reporter: Hegelstad Eiendomsselskap Arvid B. Hegelstad Mogen. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet Show more

Kleppe said in conclusion that the jury does not need to be convinced that Jensen should have contributed to more than one importation of drugs.

- It is enough that he provides information to help Cappelen, she said and pointed to the three text messages that were mentioned specifically in the tingrettsdommen.

In the spørsmålsskriftet, that the jury were given Tuesday, is the first question about Jensen is guilty of having contributed to the illegal importation of drugs. Lagretten just need to find complicity is proven for at least one of the 20 innførslene in the indictment. Kleppe emphasized that the jury does not need to be in agreement about what.

This understanding of participation went to the Fire to attack on. Much of his procedure was, therefore, well as much aimed at fagdommerne as the jury. The fire turned to a variety of legal sources, and presented that the defenders want spørsmålsskriftet to ask the jury to consider each entry.

Jensen's opportunities Comment

- It is not the case, as the prosecutor says, that about Jensen on one occasion has violated the obligation of confidentiality, or done something he should not do, when can you reply yes. It is a mistake. There is much more required than that, he said.

According to the Fire must Jensen both have known about at least one concrete entry in advance and with the intent to have contributed to the fact that it could happen.

So hammered in the Fire, the fix on Gjermund cappelen in his credibility. The prosecution put in its procedure weight of how coherent his explanation has been, from the first moment, and in how small a degree he has adjusted it for evidence.

the Fire showed successfully that it is a truth with modifications. The examples were both specific events and the whole big picture.

Cappelen explained in the questioning that Jensen always notified him when a load could be transported over the border, and that the two several times sat together in the carriage was on the way into the country. Storsmugleren also says that he has paid the cop 500 nok per kilograms of marijuana for a total of 25 to 30 tonnes, up to 15 million in total.

A compelling story Comment

such A scenario is clearly complicity, struck Fire fast.

But it is far away from what the prosecution argues, for now. Cappelen in his claims about what Jensen has done has also changed.

the Defenders have an easier job than the prosecution. To judge Jensen, at least seven jurors on each point to find guilt proven beyond any reasonable doubt.

Eldens argument shows that the defenders put everything into creating doubt, and they need only to convince more than three jurors that Jensen should be acquitted. It is certainly possible.

MORRISON: the Procedures in the trial of Eirik Jensen still has today. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet / Pool Show more
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.