Hermansson hope extrakongress can put an end to the fulspel

On 3 march by the social democrats in Gothenburg, sweden hold an extraordinary party congress. A united distriktsstyrelse want Ann-Sofie Hermansson less, and in march shall be the members get their say.

" I think it is a good solution. I feel that I have a strong support in the party and think it is a good solution to get a wider partiförsamlings idea of how this should be solved, " says Ann-Sofie Hermansson to DN.

" It feels as if support is available, after the reactions I received on Monday: stand up for yourself, do not down you for fulspelet, running on with the changes you started in Gothenburg, sweden. During my three years, I have experienced the strong support of both when I was elected and during the trip.

– Yes if the delegates at a party conference saying that it is time so is it no doubt about it. But I want to be judged by a wider partikonstellation, and not by a small circle (district board) which fulspelat against me for a long time. To fold down and slide away in it I think would be bad for the party.

has led to a necessary change since she took over as leader of the social democrats in Gothenburg three years ago.

" the Numbers were on the way down the hill, and it has required a restructuring to adjust to a new terrain. We have had rödgrön coalition that benefited us for many years. But we have lost a little of the socialist identity and the need to develop as a party.

the district board has argued that the Alliance has taken power in Gothenburg is because of the problems of working together as Hermansson is responsible for.

" I guess they are aiming at I did not want to write in on a rödgrönrosa budget.

Ann-Sofie Hermansson believes that the board of directors father with falsehood when it says that she has worked contrary to what the board said, because it had given her a clear mandate to do as she did.

"It has taken formal and unanimous decision, in fullmäktigegruppen and a district board, if all of the key positions," she says.

He had responsibility for several heavy political issues such as traffic, environment and urban development. On Facebook he writes that the departure was a matter of conscience:

”I feel very uncomfortable in that I feel that there is a small circuit that takes the key strategic decisions for our work in Gothenburg.”

" I regret it of course. But I believe that it has been a tradition that the man should have his own workshop, it is not bad, but there will be no uniform and we lose our clarity. When it is not possible to agree so I must in the role of the group leader to decide. Perhaps it can be perceived as a little heavy-handed. With that said, I of course talk with people and see if there is something I can and should do differently.

" It is clear the says it. But Anna has argued in this direction for a long time.

During the run-up to Anna Johansson have given Ann-Sofie Hermansson a reprimand to downplay the issues related to the ”extremism and hedersförtryck,” according to Hermansson.

" It's not that someone is preventing me from working actively with these issues. And when I got tillsägelsen of Anna, so I stood on me. It is easy to land in discussions about racism and islamophobia.

with the advent of NMR, demonstrating on the streets, and left-autonomous forces for the part, and religiously conditioned to extremism. But if you want to build an equal society, you can't skip to talk about this.

Karin Eriksson: Sensational with an open power struggle

P-violation in Gothenburg – Sweden refuses to resign

Then decides S on the Hermanssons future in Göteborg