/>

Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

reads.

Gregoretti, Casini: I voted against the process, a Salvini, not to do him a favour, but to defend a principle
the Senator Pier Ferdinando Casini, she was the only one of the majority to vote in favour of Salvini. Why?
"Because in the conduct of the Salvini on the Gregoretti I have not seen elements of private interest, or a deliberate violation of the policy of the government of the Count. The Cinquestelle say that the cases Diciotti, which saved Salvini, and Gregoretti, which have the mandate to process, are different, because in the second case, Salvini would have violated the line of the government. But I, I read the cards, I assure you that there is no difference between the two cases. And Diciotti, I voted against the authorization to proceed of Salvini".

do You think that the Count at the time was not dissociò?
"it is Not. He could convene the council of ministers and to initiate an action of distrust. Could you give an order, as he did in the minors, which impose the landing. There was not even this. Simply the M5S has changed my mind. I do not agree with, specifically, the line of the Pd, but at least they were current, such as Forza Italia and Fratelli d'italia".

Him to the judgment is therefore a political error?
"you See, from Salvini I divide everything. I am in the classroom I always voted against his measures. But they must be the italians to send him home, or to say that can not do more, the minister of the Interior, not the judges, with all due respect. Instead we continue to delegate to the judges a sort of a substitute".

How to explain it?
"For cowardice, weakness, guilt. When the politicians, there were people who took bribes could not be credible, and the work of the judiciary has become a substitute. I say: we have to be careful. Because it can become a spiral. Does not mean to be lenient with the corrupt, but inflexible on the prerogatives of politics."

agree, but keep the 131 migrants for four days on a ship is a seizure of person or not?
it Is a political behaviour is very questionable, who do not adotterei ever, but it was a clear choice on immigration that has made the government as a collective body,"

But it is a crime or not?
"I See that even the judges are divided. The Prosecutor's office wanted to store. The court of ministers no. It's all questionable, in short".

Fears that the current government wants to get rid of him through the courts?
"I don't know, but if so it would be the greatest favor that you could do Salvini"

There is the previous Berlusconi.
"Yes, but Berlusconi had done the three times premier, and it was at the end of the race. Has certainly not been wrought for the judicial system. I believe that there can be no sagging on the foundations of the liberal state, which ensures the balance of powers. The sardines are, as you far from me, but they have had the courage of thwarting the Salvini in the squares".

Salvini said: "I completely Agree with the intervention of shit, I never thought that would happen".
"leave Me indifferent. I mica I did it for Salvini. They are now in the age of maturity, I don't have to make a career. I'm interested in defending the principles".

"The Republic will fight always in defense of the freedom of information, to its readers and to all those who have at heart the principles of democracy and civil coexistence"

Carlo Verdelli SUBSCRIBERS TO REPUBLIC © Reproduction reserved reader COMMENTS Today on the “Well Patrick,” The rector of Bologna calls together the vertices: “very serious Case” Di Maio: “in Cairo, we need an ambassador. For Zaky, and to Giulio,” Primary Uses, the dem americans remain divided between the radical left and moderate, “Ready for the revolution?” So Sanders has persuaded the young
the Republic
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.