Post a Comment Print Share on Facebook

Does the big city to pay expenses, when the neighbors of a municipality are its indoor swimming pools and museums? – Yle asked the mps from the

Ympäyskuntien residents use a lot of services, which are paid tampere tax money. neighbor of a deviation, for example, swimming pool or municipal pool, visit

- 22 reads.

Does the big city to pay expenses, when the neighbors of a municipality are its indoor swimming pools and museums? – Yle asked the mps from the

Ympäyskuntien residents use a lot of services, which are paid tampere tax money.

neighbor of a deviation, for example, swimming pool or municipal pool, visit the museum centre vapriikki in and go to the Tampere Philharmonic concert.

Why smaller municipalities actually acceptable to invest in, say, a swimming pool or other sports places, when the inhabitants from the centre of the city service bus or the little car?

But who pays the bill?

users of the ticket income is not sufficient to maintain the extensive services, but central the city pays the largest part and the state to assist in it. The pattern is just the same with other so-called central city around, so Tampere is this just an example.

Yle asked the Pirkanmaa mps, should this pattern take more into account the state of the money distribution-related laws and acts. The same was also asked of Tampere deputy pormestareilta as well as a few neighbors on the manager.

the Answers were divided almost, depending on whether the defendant Tampere or elsewhere in the province.

Share – center city is the additional money earned

the green of mps are equivalent to Satu Hassi and Iris Suomela directly, yes. Hassi though would start with the assessment of the economic success of the city and the deficit of the central city of the state of the relationship.

Suomela again raise the social point of view.

– Many of the social problems pile up specifically large cities, and therefore it would be reasonable that the city would have adequate funding, Suomela reasons.

Jouni Ovaskan (kesk.) according to Pirkanmaa vitality grown in a variety of investments, which require state. Sakari Park (ps.) would like to reform the entire local government accounting system.

Tampere's former mayor, mps Anna-Kaisa Ikonen (ioc.) said, that the state should recognize local diversity. Among others, the Tampere high school and cultural facilities serving the pirkanmaa fries over municipal boundaries.

Also, all of Tampere, the current deputy mayor, you Alexy jäntti, development (ecr), Johanna Loukaskorpi (sd.) and Jaakko Stenhäll (gr.) consider that the central city has a special status.

– Social and health services center in the city of Tampere is responsible for almost all homeless services, and drug treatment services are more diverse and more comprehensive than in neighbouring municipalities, Johanna Loukaskorpi mentions, for example.

Non – central city going anyway

the Coalition Arto Satonen according to current practice there is no need to change, as the central city gets the benefit of his in any case.

– for Example, theatre visits that will indirectly tax the income of Tampere, as well as special medical treatment. Tays that Tampere substantial tax revenues, although patients come from all over the province and each municipality to pay his patients ' treatment.

Anna Kontula (left.) believes that the major central cities going to the current distribution formula pretty reasonably. Sami Savio (ps.) note that the state will need to replace statutory services organization, but everything else is on the decider's hands. Municipalities may also cooperate.

Pauli Kiuru (ioc.) think big and small a variety of to take sufficient account already. Additional attention would only add to the measurement and red tape.

the Centre Arto cabin bay i again don't want any new reforms before prolonged sote-reform will be the goal. Ilmari Nurminen (sd.) said, that the sote-services will be held in the future provincially Pirkanmaa.

Then do a prioritization. This does not mean the service of centralization, on the contrary. We have new research in Pirkanmaa, the fact that nearby facilities are not considered a qualifier, because it does not even savings.

Also neighbouring municipalities point of view the present system does not need to change.

Kangasala mayor Oscar Auvinen though to keep things so complicated that a yes or no answer is difficult to give. The standard model would not change either Pirkkala Marko Jarva , Ylöjärvi Jarkko Rudd and Valkeakoski Jukka Varonen .

Dumb – out

Pirkanmaa mps has a total of 19. They 13 answered Yle Tampere's question.

Subscribe Yle newsletters! Proceed to order
Avatar
Your Name
Post a Comment
Characters Left:
Your comment has been forwarded to the administrator for approval.×
Warning! Will constitute a criminal offense, illegal, threatening, offensive, insulting and swearing, derogatory, defamatory, vulgar, pornographic, indecent, personality rights, damaging or similar nature in the nature of all kinds of financial content, legal, criminal and administrative responsibility for the content of the sender member / members are belong.